Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/3] toolchain: add support of ARC architecture

Hi Jonas, On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 15:18 +0200, Jonas Gorski wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Alexey Brodkin > wrote: > > Hi Jonas, > > > > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 10:08 +0200, Jonas Gorski wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:03 PM,

[OpenWrt-Devel] [CC 15.05-rc3] bind: Security update (2 CVEs)

The bind package has been rebuilt and was uploaded to the Chaos Calmer 15.05 Release Candicate 3 repository due to multiple security issues. VERSION 9.9.6-P1-2 => 9.9.7-P3-1 CHANGELOG [Thu, 3 Sep 2015 14:03:41 +0200 ffda9cc] Update to 9.9.7-P3 to fix CVE-2015-5722 and CVE-2015-5986 [Thu, 3

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][RESEND][v2] CC: ar71xx: add support for D-LINK DIR-615 rev. Ix board

backport of r46248. Signed-off-by: Jaehoon You rebased on r46767. --- target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh | 1 + .../ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/01_leds | 8 ++ .../ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/02_network | 1 +

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] fcc hardware lockdown

Il 03.09.2015 16:59 demos ha scritto: That is a possible list for further coordination of resistance: http://lists.prplfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fcc Here is a wiki page from LibrePlanet that is explaining the problem and its conseguences in depth and tries to coordinate

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Add 'traceroute6' to busybox default features

This patch adds 'traceroute6' to the default features of Busybox. Signed-off-by: Hannu Nyman --- Reference to earlier discussion: https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2015-August/034828.html On Sat Aug 1 16:47:02 CEST 2015 Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2015-08-01

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] generic: Fix per interface nf_call_iptables setting

On 2015-09-02 19:47, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > commit r30917 ("kernel: bypass all netfilter hooks if the sysctls for that > functionality have been disabled - eliminates the overhead of enabling > CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER in the kernel config") introduced an optimization > which should

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] generic: Fix per interface nf_call_iptables setting

On Wednesday 02 September 2015 19:47:43 Sven Eckelmann wrote: [...] > | kernel | br-nf-* global | nf-call* iface | download | upload | > |-|||--|--| > | default | 0 | - | 209 |

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] generic: Fix per interface nf_call_iptables setting

On Thursday 03 September 2015 12:52:07 Felix Fietkau wrote: [...] > Did your test have the ebtables modules loaded or not? If I remember > correctly, the patch you're removing was added mainly for the case where > CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER=y is set, but ebtables is not loaded. No, ebtables was not

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] generic: Fix per interface nf_call_iptables setting

On Thursday 03 September 2015 13:31:32 Sven Eckelmann wrote: > On Thursday 03 September 2015 12:52:07 Felix Fietkau wrote: > [...] > > Did your test have the ebtables modules loaded or not? If I remember > > correctly, the patch you're removing was added mainly for the case where > >

[OpenWrt-Devel] [DRAFT PATCH] Uboot patch -Sunxi BPI-R1 not building a bootable image

Over the past week since the kernel version moved to the 4.x series, new built images are not bootable. With the serial console connected it seems that its not completing Uboot properly. This is the only output. U-Boot SPL 2015.07 (Sep 02 2015 - 20:52:15) DRAM: 1024 MiB CPU: 91200Hz,

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] European Commission secretly passes same measure as FCC OpenWRT ban ?

i think that is very similar to the FCC thing. Some ideas how to deal with that may also be there: https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Save_WiFi German forum about that: https://forum.freifunk.net/t/6732/19 how these issues touch german legislation:

[OpenWrt-Devel] European Commission secretly passes same measure as FCC OpenWRT ban ?

Seems to be one German newspaper reporting that Directive 2014/53/EU places an EU ban on flashing devices. http://www.heise.de/netze/meldung/Funkregulierung-Angriff-auf-alternative-Software-2803189.html

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] European Commission secretly passes same measure as FCC OpenWRT ban ?

I have the impression that this type of fight is the same of in the early days of MP3 Audio/Vídeo industry fighting against it. And now Taxi companies fighting against Uber. It´s a fight, that even coming from government, will never be won. Fernando On 03/09/2015 21:07, demos wrote: i think

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/3] toolchain: add support of ARC architecture

Hi, On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > Hi Jonas, > > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 10:08 +0200, Jonas Gorski wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Alexey Brodkin >> wrote: >> > This includes binutils, gcc, gdb

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 3/3] linux: add support of Synopsys ARC boards

Hi, On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > Hi Jonas, > > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 10:32 +0200, Jonas Gorski wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Alexey Brodkin >> wrote: >> > This patch introduces support of new

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] European Commission secretly passes same measure as FCC OpenWRT ban ?

> >Caleb James DeLisle: > >>Seems to be one German newspaper reporting that Directive 2014/53/EU > >>places an EU ban on flashing devices. > >> > >>http://www.heise.de/netze/meldung/Funkregulierung-Angriff-auf-alternative-Software-2803189.html > >> >