> "John" == John Crispin writes:
>> IMHO if you want to add "freshness" and still leverage the old brand
>> you do something like, e.g., Pepsi Zero. You do "The OpenWRT LEDE
>> Edition!".
>>
>> Just a thought.
>>
John> certainly an interesting idea worth considering.
FWIW, when our CWN w
On 22/12/2016 16:57, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:58:22 -0800 (PST)
> David Lang wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote:
>
>>> claiming that there is only one option and no alternatives is just
>>> not constructive and wont lead to a broad discussion during which
>
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Stefan Monnier
wrote:
> Currently, LEDE has the same problem as LibreOffice, but compounded by
> the fact that most people have no idea what LEDE is, let alone that it's
> somehow related to OpenWRT.
Not only this, but LibreOffice and OpenOffice are both, well,
>> - While brands have value, you can change a name without losing all the
>> brand recognition. I'm thinking here of cases like XBMC->Kodi or
>> OpenOffice-> LibreOffice.
> I would point at OpenOffice -> LibreOffice as a failure of name changes.
There are several aspects in a name change. E.g.
On 22/12/2016 09:58, David Lang wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote:
>
>> On 22/12/2016 09:42, David Lang wrote:
>>> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote:
>>>
> Yes, the name is pointing at a product that doesn't exist any longer,
> but Deb and Ian aren't involved with De
On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote:
On 22/12/2016 09:42, David Lang wrote:
On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote:
Yes, the name is pointing at a product that doesn't exist any longer,
but Deb and Ian aren't involved with Debian any longer either. At some
point the fact that a name is k
On 22/12/2016 09:42, David Lang wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote:
>
>>> Yes, the name is pointing at a product that doesn't exist any longer,
>>> but Deb and Ian aren't involved with Debian any longer either. At some
>>> point the fact that a name is known matters far more than t
On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote:
Yes, the name is pointing at a product that doesn't exist any longer,
but Deb and Ian aren't involved with Debian any longer either. At some
point the fact that a name is known matters far more than the historical
reasons for the name.
a problem that ca
On 22/12/2016 09:40, David Lang wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
>> - While brands have value, you can change a name without losing all the
>> brand recognition. I'm thinking here of cases like XBMC->Kodi or
>> OpenOffice->LibreOffice.
>
> I would point at OpenOffice ->
On 22/12/2016 09:36, David Lang wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:29 PM, David Lang wrote:
>>> On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Kathy Giori wrote:
>>>
From a PR perspective, I strongly suggest keeping the term OpenWrt as
part of the branding of the pro
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Stefan Monnier wrote:
- While brands have value, you can change a name without losing all the
brand recognition. I'm thinking here of cases like XBMC->Kodi or
OpenOffice->LibreOffice.
I would point at OpenOffice -> LibreOffice as a failure of name changes.
David Lang
_
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Dave Taht wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:29 PM, David Lang wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Kathy Giori wrote:
From a PR perspective, I strongly suggest keeping the term OpenWrt as
part of the branding of the project moving forward. It can just be
cosmetic (web site, etc.)
12 matches
Mail list logo
