Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

2017-05-29 Thread Alexandru Ardelean
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2017-05-29 09:03, John Crispin wrote: >> (resend, this time as plain text) >> >> Hi, >> >> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments >> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber >>

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

2017-05-29 Thread Alexandru Ardelean
On Tue, 30 May 2017 at 08:38, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2017-05-29 09:03, John Crispin wrote: > > (resend, this time as plain text) > > > > Hi, > > > > here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments > > people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remebe

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

2017-05-29 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2017-05-29 09:03, John Crispin wrote: > (resend, this time as plain text) > > Hi, > > here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments > people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber > that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering t

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

2017-05-29 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On 29 May 2017 at 09:03, John Crispin wrote: > here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments > people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber that > post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the proposal with many > details will delay th

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

2017-05-29 Thread John Crispin
*) rules - owrt will adopt the lede rules and voting system ACK from me aswell. *) branding - the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand - a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most people said they did not care - as the last vote had a 100% ACK for a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

2017-05-29 Thread Hans Dedecker
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:03 AM, John Crispin wrote: > (resend, this time as plain text) > > > Hi, > > here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments > people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber that > post remerge anything can be voted on, so c

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

2017-05-29 Thread Daniel Golle
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 09:03:57AM +0200, John Crispin wrote: > (resend, this time as plain text) > > Hi, > > here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments > people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber that > post remerge anything can be voted

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OpenWrt-Hackers] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

2017-05-29 Thread Florian Fainelli
Le 05/29/17 à 00:03, John Crispin a écrit : > (resend, this time as plain text) > > Hi, > > here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments > people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber > that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

2017-05-29 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 05/29/2017 09:03 AM, John Crispin wrote: > (resend, this time as plain text) > > Hi, > > here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments > people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber > that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

2017-05-29 Thread Stijn Tintel
On 29-05-17 09:03, John Crispin wrote: > (resend, this time as plain text) > > Hi, > > here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments > people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please > remeber that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the > p

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

2017-05-29 Thread Matthias Schiffer
On 05/29/2017 09:03 AM, John Crispin wrote: > (resend, this time as plain text) > > Hi, > > here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments > people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber > that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Unable to connect with uqmi ("No effect")

2017-05-29 Thread Carlo Lobrano
On 29 May 2017 at 14:46, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Carlo Lobrano writes: > > > On 29 May 2017 at 14:24, Bjørn Mork wrote: > > > >> > >> Great! And if you reboot the modem in this state, does it still come up > >> as connected? > > > > > > > > ​Nope, still "disconnected"​ > > Then I believe everythin

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Unable to connect with uqmi ("No effect")

2017-05-29 Thread Bjørn Mork
Carlo Lobrano writes: > On 29 May 2017 at 14:24, Bjørn Mork wrote: > >> >> Great! And if you reboot the modem in this state, does it still come up >> as connected? > > > > ​Nope, still "disconnected"​ Then I believe everything works as expected. Bjørn

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Unable to connect with uqmi ("No effect")

2017-05-29 Thread Carlo Lobrano
On 29 May 2017 at 14:24, Bjørn Mork wrote: > > Great! And if you reboot the modem in this state, does it still come up > as connected? ​Nope, still "disconnected"​ ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Unable to connect with uqmi ("No effect")

2017-05-29 Thread Bjørn Mork
Carlo Lobrano writes: >> >> Probably. My point was just that you could try to include >> "--autoconnect", which will disable the autoconnect feature. I am too >> lazy to bother to write the whole command ;-) > > > I understand :D > > By the way, it looks like that the handle for > when-you-dont

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Unable to connect with uqmi ("No effect")

2017-05-29 Thread Carlo Lobrano
> > Probably. My point was just that you could try to include > "--autoconnect", which will disable the autoconnect feature. I am too > lazy to bother to write the whole command ;-) I understand :D By the way, it looks like that the handle for when-you-dont-know-what-the-handle-is is 0xFFF

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Unable to connect with uqmi ("No effect")

2017-05-29 Thread Bjørn Mork
Carlo Lobrano writes: >> AFAICS, that is the expected result. The modem is connected and you do >> not disconnect, so "start-network" has no effect. > > Yes, you're right, but why am I connected in the first place? There is no > context configured If autoconnect is enabled, then I believe the m

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Unable to connect with uqmi ("No effect")

2017-05-29 Thread Carlo Lobrano
Hi Bjørn, thanks for the reply > AFAICS, that is the expected result. The modem is connected and you do > not disconnect, so "start-network" has no effect. Yes, you're right, but why am I connected in the first place? There is no context configured > If "--set-autoconnect disabled" does not wo

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] Remerge logo ideas

2017-05-29 Thread Imre Kaloz
On 2017-05-29 13:10, Jamie Stuart wrote: See another iteration, with: - correct capitalisation - antenna to the side (will not work with lowercase ’n’) - open sans typeface (open source) - mockups of website header - accent colours http://i.imgur.com/ZKtcFXo.png Nice :) Personally I like the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Unable to connect with uqmi ("No effect")

2017-05-29 Thread Bjørn Mork
Carlo Lobrano writes: > Hello, > > Hope this is the right place to ask for help and my apologies if it is not. > > I'm testing uqmi with a Telit LE910 LTE modem on Ubuntu 16.10, but I'm > facing this weird issue. > Uqmi considers the modem connected from the very beginning, even if I > haven't ru

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] Remerge logo ideas

2017-05-29 Thread Jamie Stuart
See another iteration, with: - correct capitalisation - antenna to the side (will not work with lowercase ’n’) - open sans typeface (open source) - mockups of website header - accent colours http://i.imgur.com/ZKtcFXo.png > On 29 May 2017, at 13:52, John Crispin wrote: > > > > On 29/05/17 1

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] Remerge logo ideas

2017-05-29 Thread John Crispin
On 29/05/17 12:11, Jamie Stuart wrote: Hi, First of all, I’m glad to hear the process of remerging LEDE with OpenWrt is moving forward. For what it’s worth, if prefer the LEDE name (it’s friendlier - ‘leddy’ - and not tied to the name of an old router!) However, it seems the consensus is tha

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] Remerge logo ideas

2017-05-29 Thread Martin Tippmann
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Jamie Stuart wrote: > Hi, > First of all, I’m glad to hear the process of remerging LEDE with OpenWrt is > moving forward. > For what it’s worth, if prefer the LEDE name (it’s friendlier - ‘leddy’ - and > not tied to the name of an old router!) > > However, it s

[OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] Remerge logo ideas

2017-05-29 Thread Jamie Stuart
Hi, First of all, I’m glad to hear the process of remerging LEDE with OpenWrt is moving forward. For what it’s worth, if prefer the LEDE name (it’s friendlier - ‘leddy’ - and not tied to the name of an old router!) However, it seems the consensus is that the OpenWrt name should remain. I though

[OpenWrt-Devel] Unable to connect with uqmi ("No effect")

2017-05-29 Thread Carlo Lobrano
Hello, Hope this is the right place to ask for help and my apologies if it is not. I'm testing uqmi with a Telit LE910 LTE modem on Ubuntu 16.10, but I'm facing this weird issue. Uqmi considers the modem connected from the very beginning, even if I haven't run --start-network yet and even if I us

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

2017-05-29 Thread John Crispin
On 29/05/17 10:39, Tom Psyborg wrote: Compared to Flyspray, Trac is a nightmare to administer. It leaks resources like a sieve and tends to slow down to a crawl under load. Regards, Jo Could you be more specific? I don't see how can it leak resources. About slow down, hav

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

2017-05-29 Thread Tom Psyborg
> Compared to Flyspray, Trac is a nightmare to administer. It leaks > resources like a sieve and tends to slow down to a crawl under load. > > Regards, > Jo > > Could you be more specific? I don't see how can it leak resources. About slow down, have you ever chekced the server it is hosted on, or c

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

2017-05-29 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi Tom, > I'd vote for re-enabling trac for all users, instead of wasting time and > resources on another flyspray instance or even existing one which > compared to trac does not bring any breakthrough features. Compared to Flyspray, Trac is a nightmare to administer. It leaks resources like a si

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

2017-05-29 Thread Tom Psyborg
On 29 May 2017 at 08:56, John Crispin wrote: > Hi, > > here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments > people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. > > *) trac > - trac is already readonly, keep content so that search engines can still > find the it > - edit t

[OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V3

2017-05-29 Thread John Crispin
(resend, this time as plain text) Hi, here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the proposal with many details will delay the remerge