The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
hi,
using the latest stuff from y
The initramfs json data does not contain all fields.
E.g. no default_packages. As such, the python scripts
need to properly merge the json data of the images.
Signed-off-by: Moritz Warning
---
scripts/json_add_image_info.py | 28 --
scripts/json_overview_image_info.py | 44 +
The OpenWrt Image Builder only builds images for one device per call.
This causes the profiles.json files to only contain the data of the
last device that was build.
Signed-off-by: Moritz Warning
---
scripts/json_overview_image_info.py | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scri
The initramfs images are missing from the profiles.json files.
Signed-off-by: Moritz Warning
---
include/image.mk | 17 -
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/image.mk b/include/image.mk
index 8f46c75ffe..fc73658a9a 100644
--- a/include/image.mk
+
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stijn Segers [mailto:f...@volatilesystems.org]
> Sent: Freitag, 8. Januar 2021 16:33
> To: Sander Vanheule
> Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; Adrian Schmutzler
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] realtek: add support for ZyXEL GS1900-8HP v1
> and v2
I've
Rosen Penev wrote:
> The first two are useless as /bin/sh can execute those scripts just
> fine. Shellcheck reports no problems.
> Telnet patch is useless as telnet is no longer used in OpenWrt.
telnetd .. ^^ and here?
___
openwr
Rename EdgeRouter Lite board_name value and prefix it with vendor abbreviation
UBNT, as done for other Ubiquiti devices in the tree. Ensure backward sysupgrade
compatibility as well.
Signed-off-by: Stijn Segers
---
.../octeon/base-files/lib/preinit/01_sysinfo | 2 +-
.../octeon/base-files/l
Rosen Penev kirjoitti 8.1.2021 klo 5.30:
...
Refresh config and patches.
Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev
---
v3: more complete config refresh.
v2: refreshed config and slight rewording.
I have applied and tested the v3 patch series in my builds for
ath79/WNDR3700v2, ipq806x/R7800 and mvebu/
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Stijn Segers
> Sent: Freitag, 8. Januar 2021 16:33
> To: Sander Vanheule
> Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; Adrian Schmutzler
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] realtek: add support
Hi Roman,
Op vrijdag 8 januari 2021 om 19:31 schreef Roman Kuzmitskii
:
there is no good way to differentiate between devices in runtime if
they
use the same platform.
custom dts would be a better solution in case of edgerouter lite since
upstream (kernel) already have one for e100 (edger
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Alexander 'lynxis' Couzens
> Sent: Freitag, 8. Januar 2021 17:36
> To: Sorin Pop
> Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; Adrian Schmutzler
>
> Subject: Re: ramips: add support for Xia
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Alexander Couzens
> Sent: Freitag, 8. Januar 2021 13:43
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Cc: Alexander Couzens
> Subject: [PATCH] ramips: fix partition layout of xiaomi mi
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Rafal Milecki
> Sent: Freitag, 8. Januar 2021 14:53
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Cc: Rafał Miłecki
> Subject: [PATCH] bcm4908: initial work on the Broadcom BCM4908 tar
Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens
---
wireless.c | 42 ++
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
diff --git a/wireless.c b/wireless.c
index 818f7c994da8..4422656065b0 100644
--- a/wireless.c
+++ b/wireless.c
@@ -11,6 +11,21 @@
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
Hi Sorin,
do you know if the Xiaomi Mi Router 4A is the same?
I've a router 4a (100m) around which boots from
bc26. Most likely a EU variant.
Best,
lynxis
> It seems that the difference is not that it's 4AC because even the
> one
> in OpenWrt ATM is a 4AC (defined as 4A) but what I found ou
Hi Adrian,
Op vrijdag 8 januari 2021 om 13u30 schreef Adrian Schmutzler
:
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
On Behalf Of Stijn Segers
Sent: Freitag, 8. Januar 2021 11:28
To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Subject: [PATCH
Hi,
Op vrijdag 8 januari 2021 om 13u29 schreef Adrian Schmutzler
:
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
On Behalf Of Stijn Segers
Sent: Freitag, 8. Januar 2021 11:28
To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] o
Hi,
Op vrijdag 8 januari 2021 om 16u19 schreef Sander Vanheule
:
Hi Stijn,
On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 14:32 +0100, Stijn Segers wrote:
diff --git a/target/linux/realtek/image/Makefile
b/target/linux/realtek/image/Makefile
index 765e516a0a..39b28b6c67 100644
--- a/target/linux/realtek/image/Mak
Hi Stijn,
On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 14:32 +0100, Stijn Segers wrote:
> diff --git a/target/linux/realtek/image/Makefile
> b/target/linux/realtek/image/Makefile
> index 765e516a0a..39b28b6c67 100644
> --- a/target/linux/realtek/image/Makefile
> +++ b/target/linux/realtek/image/Makefile
> @@ -65,11 +65,
From: Rafał Miłecki
BCM4906, BCM4908 and BCM49408 are SoCs with 64 bit ARMv8 B53 CPUs.
Upstream Linux is slowly getting support for that SoCs family so it
makes sense to add target for it.
It isn't usable yet (it only produces a bootable kernel) so "source-only"
is used.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Mi
On 08.01.2021 13:42, Alexander Couzens wrote:
The partition layout doesn't match the partition layout read out by OEM
version. It's unclear to me if different firmware version have different
partition layouts.
Missing Signed-off-by
---
target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7628an_xiaomi_mi-router-4a-
Hi Jo,
I see your point. I will solve this downstream, so this can be closed.
Kind regards,
Leo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
The ZyXEL GS1900-8HP is an 8 port gigabit switch with PoE+ support.
There are two versions on the market (v1 & v2) which share similar
specs (same flash size and flash layout, same RAM size, same PoE+ power
envelope) but have a different case and board layout that they each
share with other GS1900
Hi Adrian,
This should be the final round. Run-tested on a GS1900-10HP. It's still
alive :-).
Thank you!
Stijn
Stijn Segers (2):
realtek: introduce shared DTSI for GS1900 series
realtek: add support for ZyXEL GS1900-8HP v1 and v2
.../realtek/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network | 6 +
...
The ZyXEL GS1900-8HP v1, v2 and GS1900-10HP are all built on a similar
Realtek RTL8380M platform. Create a common DTSI in preparation for
GS1900-8HP support, and switch to the macros defined in rtl838x.dtsi.
Signed-off-by: Stijn Segers
---
.../realtek/dts/rtl8380_zyxel_gs1900-10hp.dts | 233 +---
Hi,
I'm afraid this approach is not really acceptable. Automatically calling `uci
commit` outside of the early-boot / uci-defaults context is not safe.
There could be arbitrary user defined, intentionally uncommitted changes
stashed when the ifup sequence is running which you would inadvertently
The partition layout doesn't match the partition layout read out by OEM
version. It's unclear to me if different firmware version have different
partition layouts.
---
target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7628an_xiaomi_mi-router-4a-100m.dts | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --gi
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Stijn Segers
> Sent: Freitag, 8. Januar 2021 11:28
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] octeon: add EdgeRouter Lite specific network config
>
> The Ubiqui
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Stijn Segers
> Sent: Freitag, 8. Januar 2021 11:28
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] octeon: rename erlite to ubnt,erlite
>
> Prefix EdgeRouter Lite bo
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Leonardo Mörlein
> Sent: Freitag, 8. Januar 2021 02:25
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Cc: Leonardo Mörlein
> Subject: [PATCH] wireguard-tools: allow generating private_k
Prefix EdgeRouter Lite board_name value with vendor abbreviation UBNT, as other
Ubiquiti
devices do, and use full name "Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite" as model value.
Signed-off-by: Stijn Segers
---
.../octeon/base-files/lib/preinit/01_sysinfo | 10 --
.../octeon/base-files/lib/preinit/7
These patches align the EdgeRouter Lite device with modern OpenWrt
practices:
- Use vendor prefix for board_name: ubnt,erlite instead of erlite.
- Set the model to "Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite".
- Add an EdgeRouter Lite match in /etc/board.d/01_network so all
network interfaces get configured: eth0
The Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite has three network interfaces. Add a
specific match in /etc/board.d/01_network so they all get set up.
Default to eth0 for WAN and an eth1 + eth2 bridge for LAN.
Signed-off-by: Stijn Segers
---
target/linux/octeon/base-files/etc/board.d/01_network | 3 +++
1 file chan
33 matches
Mail list logo
