On 19.05.21 00:09, Paul Spooren wrote:
Hi,
On 5/18/21 11:52 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed that there are several AX routers from TP-Link, Netgear,
D-Link, etc. and some of them have even had OpenWRT ported to them.
Which of these various platforms has the most
Hauke,
thanks for the pointer.
My comments in the original thread.
Sven
Am Sonntag, 16. Mai 2021, 23:34:04 CEST schrieb Hauke Mehrtens:
>
> I debugged a similar problem a week ago and added this patch to opkg:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openwrt/patch/20210502205912.23753-1-ha
>
Hi,
Am Montag, 3. Mai 2021, 19:46:22 CEST schrieb Hauke Mehrtens:
> On 5/3/21 2:38 PM, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 02-05-21, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> >> When a package is not installed because it has unresolved dependencies
> >>
> >> normally we get only an error message like
Hi,
On 5/18/21 11:52 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed that there are several AX routers from TP-Link, Netgear, D-Link, etc.
and some of them have even had OpenWRT ported to them.
Which of these various platforms has the most CPU/RAM/FLASH? A few are discussed, but I'm
not
Hi all,
I noticed that there are several AX routers from TP-Link, Netgear, D-Link, etc.
and some of them have even had OpenWRT ported to them.
Which of these various platforms has the most CPU/RAM/FLASH? A few are
discussed, but I'm not seeing consensus on "the best one currently is this..."
From: Rafał Miłecki
Old "interface" sections for bridges were mixing layer 2 and layer 3.
That syntax got deprecated and UCI section "device" is used for bridge
configuration now.
Backward compatibility may be dropped from netifd soon now so migrate
old configs using uci-defaults script.
The ZyXEL LTE3301-Plus is an 4G indoor CPE with 2 external LTE antennas.
Specifications:
- SoC: MediaTek MT7621AT
- RAM: 256 MB
- Flash: 128 MB MB NAND (MX30LF1G18AC)
- WiFi: MediaTek MT7615E
- Switch: 4 LAN ports (Gigabit)
- LTE: Quectel EG506 connected by USB3 to SoC
- SIM: 1 micro-SIM
This adds a new device id to the image tools.
Signed-off-by: André Valentin
---
tools/firmware-utils/src/zytrx.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/tools/firmware-utils/src/zytrx.c b/tools/firmware-utils/src/zytrx.c
index 302efc6010..b3bbbe3c69 100644
---
This set adds support for the ZyXEL LTE3301-Plus, an indoor 3G/4G indoor LTE
router with Wifi.
André Valentin (2):
firmware-utils: zytrx: Add support for ZyXEL LTE3301-Plus
ramips: mt7621: Add support for ZyXEL LTE3301-Plus
package/boot/uboot-envtools/files/ramips | 1 +
Since upstream commit 6467de5a8840 ("Randomize z ordinates in
scalar mult when timing resistant") WolfSSL requires a RNG for
the EC key when built hardened which is the default.
Set the RNG for the EC key to fix connections for OWE clients.
Signed-off-by: David Bauer
---
OWE operation of WolfSSL hostapd and wpad daemons has been broken since
WolfSSL was updated to 4.5.0.
This is due to the fact WolfSSL now requires a RNG for EC keys, however
there is no stable interface available for hardened as well as
non-hardened builds.
Patch hostapd to add the RNG to the EC
Since commit 6467de5a8840 ("Randomize z ordinates in scalar
mult when timing resistant") wolfssl requires a RNG for an EC
key when the hardened built option is selected.
wc_ecc_set_rng is only available when built hardened, so there
is no safe way to install the RNG to the key regardless whether
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:36 PM Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>
> On 5/18/21 7:03 PM, Robert Marko wrote:
> > 5.10.37 introduced a lot of DVFS changes for Armada 37xx from 5.13 kernel.
> >
> > Unfortunately commit:
> >
On 5/18/21 7:03 PM, Robert Marko wrote:
5.10.37 introduced a lot of DVFS changes for Armada 37xx from 5.13 kernel.
Unfortunately commit:
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
Hi!
The NBG6716 has recently
5.10.37 introduced a lot of DVFS changes for Armada 37xx from 5.13 kernel.
Unfortunately commit:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/drivers/cpufreq/armada-37xx-cpufreq.c?h=v5.10.37=a13b110e7c9e0dc2edcc7a19d4255fc88abd83cc
This patch actually corrects the
On 5/17/21 11:09 PM, Fernando Frediani wrote:
Hello
Certainly run /sbin/init or 'procd' to have *OpenWrt-like experience*
is a better approach in my view.
So do you prefer to disable some services and make some init-scripts
"container aware"?
Regards
Fernando
On 17/05/2021 15:39,
use AUTORELEASE since BusyBox is often updaten and PKG_RELEASE is not
consistently bumped. Also use SPDX license headers to be machine
readable and bump the copyright year to 2021.
Signed-off-by: Paul Spooren
---
I'd like to see this backported as well.
package/utils/busybox/Makefile | 9
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 04:43:24PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering what the best way to map a running box back to a candidate
> image would be.
>
> It seems like the tuple ($CONFIG_TARGET_BOARD, $CONFIG_TARGET_SUBTARGET,
> $CONFIG_TARGET_PROFILE) would provide this,
On 17.05.2021 14:10, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
From: Rafał Miłecki
netifd has been recently patched to use more accurate "ports" option
instead of "ifname"
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
---
.../htdocs/luci-static/resources/tools/network.js | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+),
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
> Op 17 mei 2021, om 17:47
Philip Prindeville [2021-05-17 16:43:24]:
> I could grovel the target profile out of /etc/board.json, but then my
> scripting needs to support 'jq', etc.
$ ubus call system board | jsonfilter -e @.model -e @.board_name
-- ynezz
___
openwrt-devel
Okay, I've created a PR to make this change:
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/4184
> On May 17, 2021, at 4:43 PM, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering what the best way to map a running box back to a candidate
> image would be.
>
> It seems like the tuple
23 matches
Mail list logo
