Re: Flagship AX routers

2021-05-21 Thread Bas Mevissen via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 5/18/21 11:52 PM, Philip

Re: Flagship AX routers

2021-05-21 Thread John Crispin
On 21.05.21 20:18, Stijn Segers wrote: Oh you'd provably get the board up and running in a jiffy. I suppose the multi-gigabit PHYs might already be supported as well - not in the loop in those. The wireless? Just look at Broadcom's FOSS track record with 802.11g/n/ac. And vote with your

Re: Flagship AX routers

2021-05-21 Thread Stijn Segers
Hi, Mike Bernardo schreef op 21 mei 2021 13:46:25 CEST: >Would be great if we could get openwrt running on these, with 2.5gigE and AX. > >https://www.fs.com/products/115390.html > >It is a BCM47622, I wonder how difficult this would be? Oh you'd provably get the board up and running in a jiffy.

Re: SquashFS mixed errors (decompression failed and others)

2021-05-21 Thread Vincent Wiemann
On 5/21/21 3:58 PM, Koen Vandeputte wrote: On 21.05.21 13:19, Ibrahim Tachijian wrote: Hello, We use approximately 10k IPQ40XX devices and we have noticed that every time we run "sysupgrade -n" we lose approximately 1% of the routers in the process. After further investigation I'm almost

Re: SquashFS mixed errors (decompression failed and others)

2021-05-21 Thread Koen Vandeputte
On 21.05.21 13:19, Ibrahim Tachijian wrote: Hello, We use approximately 10k IPQ40XX devices and we have noticed that every time we run "sysupgrade -n" we lose approximately 1% of the routers in the process. After further investigation I'm almost confident that it is not the sysupgrade process

Re: SquashFS mixed errors (decompression failed and others)

2021-05-21 Thread Ibrahim Tachijian
Hello Vincent, The board is the GL.iNet GL-B1300. You can read about it here: https://openwrt.org/toh/gl.inet/gl.inet_gl-b1300 On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 2:18 PM Vincent Wiemann wrote: > > Hi Ibrahim, > > please post the affected model name. It could e.g. be a bad board design > which requires

Re: SquashFS mixed errors (decompression failed and others)

2021-05-21 Thread Vincent Wiemann
Hi Ibrahim, please post the affected model name. It could e.g. be a bad board design which requires the flash to be clocked slower or something. Without knowing the affected board, it is guessing... Best, Vincent On 5/21/21 1:19 PM, Ibrahim Tachijian wrote: Hello, We use approximately 10k

Re: Flagship AX routers

2021-05-21 Thread Mike Bernardo
Would be great if we could get openwrt running on these, with 2.5gigE and AX. https://www.fs.com/products/115390.html It is a BCM47622, I wonder how difficult this would be? I'd be tempted to buy one to give it a try. Mike > On 2021/05/21, at 04:58:46 CDT (-05:00), Daniel Golle > wrote: >

SquashFS mixed errors (decompression failed and others)

2021-05-21 Thread Ibrahim Tachijian
Hello, We use approximately 10k IPQ40XX devices and we have noticed that every time we run "sysupgrade -n" we lose approximately 1% of the routers in the process. After further investigation I'm almost confident that it is not the sysupgrade process that is the culprit - so what I did was that I

[RFC v2 2/3] ath79: add NAND driver for Mikrotik RB91xG series

2021-05-21 Thread Denis Kalashnikov
Main part is copied from ar71xx original driver rb91x_nand written by Gabor Juhos . What is done: * Support of kernel 5.4 and 5.10, * DTS support, * New gpio API (gpiod_*) support. Signed-off-by: Denis Kalashnikov --- Changelog: v1-->v2: - Do not use MFD driver API anymore. ---

[RFC v2 3/3] ath79: add support for Mikrotik RouterBoard 912G

2021-05-21 Thread Denis Kalashnikov
This board has been supported in the ar71xx. Links: * https://mikrotik.com/product/RB912UAG-2HPnD * https://mikrotik.com/product/RB912UAG-5HPnD * https://openwrt.org/toh/hwdata/mikrotik/mikrotik_rb912uag-2hpnd * https://openwrt.org/toh/hwdata/mikrotik/mikrotik_rb912uag-5hpnd Hardware: * SoC:

[RFC v2 1/3] ath79: add gpio-latch driver for Mikrotik RouterBoards

2021-05-21 Thread Denis Kalashnikov
This is a slighty modified version of ar71xx gpio-latch driver written by Gabor Juhos . Changes: * DTS support, * New gpio API (gpiod_*). Signed-off-by: Denis Kalashnikov --- Changelog: v1-->v2: - Don't use MFD driver API anymore. --- .../ath79/files/drivers/gpio/gpio-latch.c | 225

[RFC 0/3] ath79: add support for Mikrotik RouterBoard 912G

2021-05-21 Thread Denis Kalashnikov
In the first vertion of these patches I've added a MFD driver that provides API for manipulating shared gpio lines to gpio-latch and nand drivers. Now I just port gpio-latch and rb91x_nand drivers from ar71xx to ath79 by adding DTS support and new gpio API (gpiod_*). This way turned to be more

Re: Flagship AX routers

2021-05-21 Thread Daniel Golle
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:26:58PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote: > > > > On May 18, 2021, at 10:57 PM, John Crispin wrote: > > > > On 19.05.21 00:09, Paul Spooren wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 5/18/21 11:52 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I noticed that there are

[PATCH] kernel: backport MediaTek jumbo frame support to 5.10

2021-05-21 Thread DENG Qingfang
Allow MTU up to 2026 on mediatek, ramips/mt7621 targets Signed-off-by: DENG Qingfang --- ...thernet-mediatek-support-setting-MTU.patch | 138 ++ ...1-net-dsa-mt7530-support-setting-MTU.patch | 112 ++ ...-dsa-mt7530-enable-MTU-normalization.patch | 36 + 3 files