Re: [RFT 0/5] realtek: support boards similar to DGS-1210-10

2022-07-17 Thread Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
Em dom., 17 de jul. de 2022 06:55, Paul Fertser escreveu: > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 11:32:52PM -0300, Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca wrote: > > It uses SOC := rtl8380 while all existing dgs-1210 F1 variants use > > rtl8382 (except for the pending -52 variant). The commit didn't > > mention why that h

[PATCH 1/2] ubox: fix GCC fanalyzer warnings

2022-07-17 Thread Rosen Penev
memory leaks and missing NULL checks. Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev --- kmodloader.c | 15 ++- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kmodloader.c b/kmodloader.c index 63bae5e..bc5f20c 100644 --- a/kmodloader.c +++ b/kmodloader.c @@ -336,6 +336,11 @@ static int sc

[PATCH 2/2] ubox: fix bad realloc usage

2022-07-17 Thread Rosen Penev
Both cppcheck and gcc's -fanalyzer complain here that realloc is being used improperly. Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev --- kmodloader.c | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kmodloader.c b/kmodloader.c index bc5f20c..5f8c9c1 100644 --- a/kmodloader.c +++ b/kmodloa

[sdwalker/sdwalker.github.io] 80a1be: This week's update

2022-07-17 Thread Stephen Walker via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Branch: refs/heads/master Home

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] realtek: MFD for switch core

2022-07-17 Thread Birger Koblitz
Hi Sander, On 7/17/22 15:37, Sander Vanheule wrote: On Sat, 2022-07-16 at 23:09 +0200, Birger Koblitz wrote: Hi, On 7/16/22 21:31, Sander Vanheule wrote: On Sat, 2022-07-16 at 21:09 +0200, Sander Vanheule wrote: This RFC series introduces a new MFD device for the switch core found in the Rea

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] realtek: MFD for switch core

2022-07-17 Thread Sander Vanheule
Hi Birger, In the future, could you please CC me when replying to my patches? On Sat, 2022-07-16 at 23:09 +0200, Birger Koblitz wrote: > Hi, > > On 7/16/22 21:31, Sander Vanheule wrote: > > On Sat, 2022-07-16 at 21:09 +0200, Sander Vanheule wrote: > > > This RFC series introduces a new MFD devic

Re: Question about ancient TARGET_CFLAGS in rules.mk?

2022-07-17 Thread Christian Marangi
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 01:48:41AM +0200, Ansuel Smith wrote: > Hi, > some background about this. > > I'm trying to improve our CI system more and more by finally adding > support for real > EXTERNAL_TOOLCHAIN_SUPPORT... I'm running (and abusing) the github CI > to make sure everything works and a

Re: [RFT 0/5] realtek: support boards similar to DGS-1210-10

2022-07-17 Thread Birger Koblitz
Hi, On 7/17/22 11:55, Paul Fertser wrote: On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 11:32:52PM -0300, Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca wrote: It uses SOC := rtl8380 while all existing dgs-1210 F1 variants use rtl8382 (except for the pending -52 variant). The commit didn't mention why that happened. It's just cosmetic

Re: Question about ancient TARGET_CFLAGS in rules.mk?

2022-07-17 Thread Christian Marangi
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 02:54:24AM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote: > On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 2:29 AM Christian Marangi > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 10:17:28PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 4:52 PM Ansuel Smith wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > some background abo

Re: [RFT 0/5] realtek: support boards similar to DGS-1210-10

2022-07-17 Thread Paul Fertser
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 11:32:52PM -0300, Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca wrote: > It uses SOC := rtl8380 while all existing dgs-1210 F1 variants use > rtl8382 (except for the pending -52 variant). The commit didn't > mention why that happened. It's just cosmetic AFAICT but the datasheet clearly states

Re: Question about ancient TARGET_CFLAGS in rules.mk?

2022-07-17 Thread Christian Marangi
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 02:50:36AM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote: > On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 2:29 AM Christian Marangi > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 10:17:28PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 4:52 PM Ansuel Smith wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > some background abo

Re: Question about ancient TARGET_CFLAGS in rules.mk?

2022-07-17 Thread Rosen Penev
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 2:29 AM Christian Marangi wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 10:17:28PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 4:52 PM Ansuel Smith wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > some background about this. > > > > > > I'm trying to improve our CI system more and more by fina

Re: Question about ancient TARGET_CFLAGS in rules.mk?

2022-07-17 Thread Rosen Penev
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 2:29 AM Christian Marangi wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 10:17:28PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 4:52 PM Ansuel Smith wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > some background about this. > > > > > > I'm trying to improve our CI system more and more by fina

Re: Question about ancient TARGET_CFLAGS in rules.mk?

2022-07-17 Thread Christian Marangi
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 10:17:28PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 4:52 PM Ansuel Smith wrote: > > > > Hi, > > some background about this. > > > > I'm trying to improve our CI system more and more by finally adding > > support for real > > EXTERNAL_TOOLCHAIN_SUPPORT... I'm runn