Pins from 22 to 33 are on the rgmii2 pin group. They don't function as
GPIO by default. Requesting a gpio by either from devicetree or `echo
203 > /sys/class/gpio/export` won't change anything. You have to claim
the pin group as gpio on the devicetree.
Quoting my response from [0]:
state_de
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 02:23:08AM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 05:17:43PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 6:11 AM Christian Marangi
> > wrote:
> > > added the changed to my staging repo and testing them here
> > > https://github.com/openwrt/ope
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 05:17:43PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 6:11 AM Christian Marangi
> wrote:
> > added the changed to my staging repo and testing them here
> > https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/11843.
> >
> > Merged the fstools requirement. If CI tests doesn't
CC: Sergio
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 11:29 AM Peter Naulls wrote:
>
>
>
> I posted previously on GPIOs, which caused some debate; this may or may not
> be relevant, but I'd be remiss to not mention it:
>
> http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2022-October/039593.html
>
> I've been chasi
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 6:11 AM Christian Marangi wrote:
> added the changed to my staging repo and testing them here
> https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/11843.
>
> Merged the fstools requirement. If CI tests doesn't have problems, i
> will merge this in master.
I see you've merged them to
I realized that my custom images for BCM47094 based on bcm53xx OpenWrt
21.02 can't reach 940 Mb/s NAT speeds. Such 940 Mb/s speeds are totally
possible with clean OpenWrt builds.
After some debugging I discovered that it's because I include ksmbd.
Package kmod-fs-ksmbd selects kmod-nf-nathelper-ex
I posted previously on GPIOs, which caused some debate; this may or may not
be relevant, but I'd be remiss to not mention it:
http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2022-October/039593.html
I've been chasing an issue with GPIO mapping in for an mt7621 on the OpenWrt
5.10.161 etc ker
These wrappers are not needed as CC doesn't need to be a single word.
a53b084e497a9f1629a2caada833ebe14a6838b7 which introduced the wrappers
doesn't explain why they were really needed and why only for the target
and not for the host.
Moreover, name of the wrappers breaks a ccache assumption: sin
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 09:32:22PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> TP-Link and ASUS OnHub devices are very similar, sharing many of the
> same characteristics and much of their Device Tree. They both run a
> version of ChromeOS for their factory firmware, and so installation
> instructions look very s
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 2023-01-20 13:24, Florian Ecke
On 2023-01-20 12:49, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 20.01.23 12:42, Florian Eckert wrote:
Hello Felix,
During image generation, the host tools should not be used but the
tools
from the staging_dir.
- mkfs.fat
- sed
- mmd
- mcopy
Why is this necessary? $STAGING_DIR_HOST/bin should already be in
On 20.01.23 12:42, Florian Eckert wrote:
Hello Felix,
During image generation, the host tools should not be used but the
tools
from the staging_dir.
- mkfs.fat
- sed
- mmd
- mcopy
Why is this necessary? $STAGING_DIR_HOST/bin should already be in
$PATH before the host system parts.
I only
Hello Felix,
During image generation, the host tools should not be used but the
tools
from the staging_dir.
- mkfs.fat
- sed
- mmd
- mcopy
Why is this necessary? $STAGING_DIR_HOST/bin should already be in
$PATH before the host system parts.
I only noticed that the prefix $(STAGING_DIR_HOS
On 20.01.23 09:36, Florian Eckert wrote:
During image generation, the host tools should not be used but the tools
from the staging_dir.
- mkfs.fat
- sed
- mmd
- mcopy
Why is this necessary? $STAGING_DIR_HOST/bin should already be in $PATH
before the host system parts.
- Felix
__
During image generation, the host tools should not be used but the tools
from the staging_dir.
- mkfs.fat
- sed
- mmd
- mcopy
Signed-off-by: Florian Eckert
---
target/linux/x86/image/Makefile | 11 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/x86/image/
15 matches
Mail list logo