On 2.02.2023 19:56, John Crispin wrote:
northstar could ship a uci-defaults script to populate UCI for line 37 -->
https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=blob;f=package/network/config/netifd/files/etc/hotplug.d/net/20-smp-packet-steering;h=8a86bf75f60040e97a7779628afb0993aee87c50;hb=HE
northstar could ship a uci-defaults script to populate UCI for line 37 -->
https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=blob;f=package/network/config/netifd/files/etc/hotplug.d/net/20-smp-packet-steering;h=8a86bf75f60040e97a7779628afb0993aee87c50;hb=HEAD#l37
On 02.02.23 17:06, Rafał Miłecki
On 02.02.23 17:06, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
From: Rafał Miłecki
bcm53xx comes with custom (more optimized) packet steering. A race
between two scripts was resulting in varying network performance.
Ref: fcbd39689ebf ("bcm53xx: enable & setup packet steering")
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
---
Is th
Hi all,
We had another meeting, please find the notes below:
https://openwrt.org/meetings/20230124
Sunshine,
Paul
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
From: Rafał Miłecki
bcm53xx comes with custom (more optimized) packet steering. A race
between two scripts was resulting in varying network performance.
Ref: fcbd39689ebf ("bcm53xx: enable & setup packet steering")
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
---
Is this an acceptable method to handle this?
--
Signed-off-by: Paul Dee
---
root/usr/share/ucode/fw4.uc | 64 -
1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/root/usr/share/ucode/fw4.uc b/root/usr/share/ucode/fw4.uc
index 5dce90d..96f2780 100644
--- a/root/usr/share/ucode/fw4.uc
+++ b/roo
Any takers?
ping jo wich?
On 2023-01-07 17:00, Paul D wrote:
comment is documented as a string in the man page.
Ref: https://github.com/openwrt/luci/pull/6187#issuecomment-1374506633
Signed-off-by: Paul Dee
---
root/usr/share/ucode/fw4.uc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletio
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 23:52, Jan Hoffmann wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
>
> On 2023-01-30 at 00:08, Robert Marko wrote:
> > Shouldn't it be possible for the modem driver itself to be fixed
> > instead of faking
> > the PCI details?
>
> This hack is definitely far from ideal, but I'm not sure if there i
