Boot loop on Comfast E110N

2023-10-20 Thread Bill Moffitt
I have been using an older version of OpenWRT on my E110N; I loaded up the latest release to see if it would fix some "LOST BEACON" problems. Unfortunately, it didn't even boot, so I broke out the serial cable, busted open the radio, and connected it. Here's what I captured: U-Boot 1.1.4-ge619c1

reporting kernel bugs

2023-10-20 Thread Paul D
What is the proven way forward here? I've found some delicious kernel panics while running 6.1 on broadcom H/W. But IIRC, kernel isn't interested in bugs unless you've tested on the latest versions which are not readily available to owrt. ___ openw

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Resurrect OpenWrt IXP4xx support

2023-10-20 Thread Linus Walleij
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 2:52 PM Christian Marangi wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 02:48:33PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 2:32 PM Christian Marangi > > wrote: > > > > > Yes! Would be ideal then we can just bump the linux-firmware package and > > > reference it there.

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Resurrect OpenWrt IXP4xx support

2023-10-20 Thread Christian Marangi
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 02:48:33PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 2:32 PM Christian Marangi > wrote: > > > Yes! Would be ideal then we can just bump the linux-firmware package and > > reference it there. > > OK I'll try this. > > > What would happen to the additional sou

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Resurrect OpenWrt IXP4xx support

2023-10-20 Thread Linus Walleij
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 2:32 PM Christian Marangi wrote: > Yes! Would be ideal then we can just bump the linux-firmware package and > reference it there. OK I'll try this. > What would happen to the additional source tho? Would it be included in > the submitted fw? Yes there are several things

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Resurrect OpenWrt IXP4xx support

2023-10-20 Thread Christian Marangi
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 02:26:30PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 1:33 PM Christian Marangi > wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 01:15:51PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > If there is some rough consensus on this, could someone start > > > applying these patches, apart

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Resurrect OpenWrt IXP4xx support

2023-10-20 Thread Linus Walleij
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 1:33 PM Christian Marangi wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 01:15:51PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > If there is some rough consensus on this, could someone start > > applying these patches, apart from patch 10/10 where we might > > want to do something different? > > > >

[PATCH] imagebuilder: add check if target is sourced from a feed

2023-10-20 Thread Florian Eckert
If a target is not upstream because it is still under development, it can still be added to the openwrt via a feed and can be build. Although the build is successful, no new images can be build with the new board, because it cannot find them. To fix this issue add a check to the imagebuilder and t

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Resurrect OpenWrt IXP4xx support

2023-10-20 Thread Christian Marangi
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 01:15:51PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > If there is some rough consensus on this, could someone start > applying these patches, apart from patch 10/10 where we might > want to do something different? > I started to merge the first trivial patch that just adds packages and

Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] firmware: Resurrect the ixp4xx microcode package

2023-10-20 Thread Christian Marangi
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 10:42:21AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > The firmware package for the IXP4xx microcode was deleted but > the source files are still in the file cache so we can easily > resurrect it. > > The firmware either supports ethernet (the most common) or > WAN (less common), image t

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Resurrect OpenWrt IXP4xx support

2023-10-20 Thread Linus Walleij
If there is some rough consensus on this, could someone start applying these patches, apart from patch 10/10 where we might want to do something different? If no-one is willing to shepherd IXP4xx I am willing to do commits but that requires commit access, and I don't think I can self-nominate for