Are we still use md5 as default as password hash?

2024-01-17 Thread abnoeh
old times there was a musl size hack that disabled everything except DES and md5, but that was disabled in 2021 Dec https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/commit/66768755791286fc02a38d1b437a9da74290041d, allowing sha256,sha512 and blowfish however Busybox doesn't configed to use those and still use

[PATCH] mediatek: filogic: replace built-in Aquantia driver with module

2024-01-17 Thread Rafał Miłecki
From: Rafał Miłecki Some Aquantia PHYs (e.g. AQR113C) require firmware to be uploaded by host system. With built-in drivers this doesn't work in OpenWrt / embeddded as filesystem isn't available during PHY probe. That results in delays like: [1.588068] Aquantia AQR113C mdio-bus:00: Falling

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

2024-01-17 Thread John Crispin
On 17.01.24 20:31, David Bauer wrote: Hi John, On 1/9/24 11:49, John Crispin wrote: FAQ * Why are there are 2 different flash chips? - the idea is to make the device (almost!) unbrickable and very easy to recover - NAND will hold the main loader (U-Boot) and the Linux image and will be the

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

2024-01-17 Thread David Bauer
Hi John, On 1/9/24 11:49, John Crispin wrote: FAQ * Why are there are 2 different flash chips? - the idea is to make the device (almost!) unbrickable and very easy to recover - NAND will hold the main loader (U-Boot) and the Linux image and will be the default boot device - NOR will be

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

2024-01-17 Thread John Crispin
On 17.01.24 20:28, Daniel Santos wrote: On 1/16/24 00:36, John Crispin wrote: And in the interest of running *my* own mouth, I'm stoked as hell -- LOVE that it will have mikroBUS! Thanks to John and everyone working on this! My only request is that any unused gpios that don't make it to

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

2024-01-17 Thread Daniel Santos
On 1/16/24 00:36, John Crispin wrote: And in the interest of running *my* own mouth, I'm stoked as hell -- LOVE that it will have mikroBUS! Thanks to John and everyone working on this! My only request is that any unused gpios that don't make it to mikroBUS find their way to a (possibly

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

2024-01-17 Thread Daniel Golle
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 05:47:26PM +0100, John Crispin wrote: > > On 17.01.24 17:46, Janusz Dziedzic wrote: > > Do you think I can use m.2 A->M converter here and use wifi mt7916 A+E > > (6GHz) instead of NVMe? > >

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

2024-01-17 Thread John Crispin
On 17.01.24 17:19, Fernando Frediani wrote: Hi, again, does this SoC have any type of NAT offload capability ? Now a days with common Internet Broadband plans that is becoming a must. Also is there any possibility to consider more than just 2 Ethernet ports (at least 4)? Would that increase

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

2024-01-17 Thread Janusz Dziedzic
śr., 17 sty 2024 o 16:27 John Crispin napisał(a): > > Additional FAQ for OpenWrt One > > This is a summary of some further questions regarding the OpenWrt One > project gathered so far. After OpenWrt voted to move forward, it will be > converted into a page within the OpenWrt wiki as a place for

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

2024-01-17 Thread John Crispin
On 17.01.24 17:46, Janusz Dziedzic wrote: Do you think I can use m.2 A->M converter here and use wifi mt7916 A+E (6GHz) instead of NVMe? Eg.https://kamami.pl/akcesoria-do-raspberry-pi/587051-m2-m-key-to-m2-a-key-adapter-m2-m-key-do-m2-a-key.html Will that work? so the theory but we wont know

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

2024-01-17 Thread John Crispin
Additional FAQ for OpenWrt One This is a summary of some further questions regarding the OpenWrt One project gathered so far. After OpenWrt voted to move forward, it will be converted into a page within the OpenWrt wiki as a place for collecting the latest information. Q: Will the various

Re: [PATCH] ipq95xx: Add support for IPQ9574 RDP433

2024-01-17 Thread Varadarajan Narayanan
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 01:23:01PM +, Petr Štetiar wrote: > Varadarajan Narayanan [2023-12-07 15:29:23]: > > Hi, > > > SoC : QCOM IPQ9574 > > RAM : 2GB DDR4 > > Flash : eMMC 8GB > > WiFi: 1 x 2.4GHz > > 1 x 5GHz > > 1 x 6GHz > > BTW it doesn't

Re: [PATCH] ipq95xx: Add support for IPQ9574 RDP433

2024-01-17 Thread Varadarajan Narayanan
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 11:11:03AM +0100, Robert Marko wrote: > > On 07. 12. 2023. 10:59, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: > > SoC : QCOM IPQ9574 > > RAM : 2GB DDR4 > > Flash : eMMC 8GB > > WiFi: 1 x 2.4GHz > > 1 x 5GHz > > 1 x 6GHz > > > >