Re: [PATCH] mtdsplit_uimage: Split also after offsetted uImage

2024-01-25 Thread Linus Walleij
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 12:21 AM Paul D wrote: > BTW: was this what I tested in your factory and sysimages for the XG6846? > > If so can you roll a fresh one with this patch? It has been used in all of them, but I made a new one on top of the OpenWrt main branch! https://dflund.se/~triad/krad/in

Re: [PATCH] package: add new poe-common package

2024-01-25 Thread Sander Vanheule
[Added the others back in Cc] Hi Paul, On Fri, 2024-01-26 at 00:00 +0100, Paul D wrote: > > So, the power budget is a global option. Do we ever envisage that parts > of this budget can be concretely assigned to specific ports or more > abstract ? > > e.g. > >   config port >   

Re: [PATCH] mtdsplit_uimage: Split also after offsetted uImage

2024-01-25 Thread Paul D
The simple past tense of offset is... offset :) Suggested: Split also after offset uImage BTW: was this what I tested in your factory and sysimages for the XG6846? If so can you roll a fresh one with this patch? Then I can give you a more recent Tested-By: On 2024-01-23 23:17, Linus Walle

p910nd

2024-01-25 Thread Paul D
Trying to add the almost mandatory +kmod-usb-printer to p910nd package Since just about every known configuration still mandates that the user install kmod-usb-printer. https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/23094 Is there a smarter way to add this depends? I don't yet understand how i

Re: [PATCH] package: add new poe-common package

2024-01-25 Thread Paul D
So, the power budget is a global option. Do we ever envisage that parts of this budget can be concretely assigned to specific ports or more abstract ? e.g. config port option name 'lan8' option id '1' option enable '1'

[PATCH] package: add new poe-common package

2024-01-25 Thread Sander Vanheule
Create a new package to generate configuration files for devices capable of delivering power via PoE. The configuration file at /etc/config/poe can be used by PoE daemons to configure the hardware in an implementation specific way. This is part of the core packages because it needs to be in sync w

Re: [PATCH v7] bmips: bcm6368-enetsw: Bump max MTU

2024-01-25 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 8:32 PM Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote: > I tested this: > - Comtrend AR-5381u (bcm6328 with internal switch only). > - Netgear DGND3700v2 (bcm6362 with external BCM53125 switch). > And there were no regressions on any of them. > > So I merged it @ 3cf1fe5508ee8a2a2c6e33a829