Re: here we are again: real name 'discussion'

2024-04-18 Thread John Crispin
I do not see anyone from the committers complaining about the revert. If folks felt that a vote was neccesseary, then someone would have started one. I have a feeling that folks are happy with the old status quo and no vote is required.     John On 18.04.24 16:13, Paul D wrote: On

Re: here we are again: real name 'discussion'

2024-04-18 Thread Paul D
On 2024-04-16 16:41, Etienne Champetier wrote: > Le mar. 16 avr. 2024 à 10:34, Paul D a écrit : >> >> On 2024-03-27 23:56, Etienne Champetier wrote: >>> >>> As this is a legal issue, should we get SFC opinion first ? >>> >>> Etienne >>> >> >> Is this happening? > > Sorry I missed your last ping