Applied in r39414 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r39415 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r39416 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r39417 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r39418 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r39419, r39420 and r39420 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r39422 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r39423 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
It's a bug in upstream dropbear afair.
At some point they changed some scp port separator to % to fix another
issue and that breaks the parsing of LL addrs.
Bug introduced by this:
http://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/pipermail/dropbear/2013q2/001390.html
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Applied in r39411 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r39412 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in b356773921a89b370f8ccb34c9ea5f21148115ea - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in 4e82a1fabb87b5e3c948a792e16b0fac3702721b - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi.
At the first sight the problem is solved: you open System tab and
you don't see LED Configuration option, but as soon as you select
one of the System's tabs all hidden tabs appear.
How can I remove the tab permanently for the current session? Why
removing the tab from tree (c,
OpenWrt patches the kconfig to explicitely make those symbols visible.
Reason for that is to allow disabling unused algs.
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Hi.
Could someone more familiar with the build process have a look?
Should be fixed with https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/38998 - please test.
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
Hi.
I just built this while trying to resolve an Android connectivity issue
(I'd been running r37866 previously) on a NetGear WNDR3800, and the new
build seems somewhat better, but I've noticed a couple of odd things -
I'm wondering if these are known issues, or if I should submit bugs on
The crash / disconnect issues are more likely related to the infamous
dwc_otg host driver. It is unlikely to be a problem with the bluetooth
stack itself.
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
How does one start a new device-specific target for the atheros platform?
One approach that might work is trying to identify the board by its
radio, then apply the required configuration on firstboot.
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
the patches are fine, just took ma while to runtime test it.
Committed in r38778 and r38779 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Fixed with https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/38743
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
They're part of the core packages:
package/libs/libiconv/
package/libs/libiconv-full/
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Hi.
Comments inline.
This is a patch for the most recent stable build of OpenvSwitch (2.0.0).
It supports kernels 2.6.32 - 3.10.x
It was taken and updated from Julius Shulz-Zander's work:
https://github.com/schuza/openvswitch
Signed-off-by: Peter Holland phollan...@gmail.com
---
diff
Hi Nathan,
this series looks very well, ACK from me for merging it with a little
comment on the wds interface naming; for mac80211 we use a dash as vif
number separator, so wlan0 is vif 1 on phy0, wlan0-1 is vif 2 on phy 0 etc.
I suggest using the same for wl, means wl0 is vif 1 on radio 0,
Hi,
in general I do consider this idea but I do not agree with the
implementation in your patch.
In particular I think that the firewall init script is the wrong place
to unload kmods, actually I think a random service should never unload
kmods, at most only load them when needed for the first
Hi.
Simply define an empty Build/Compile section:
define Build/Compile
endef
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Hi.
Yes, remove the PKG_INSTALL:=1 from your Makefile.
It tells OpenWrt to invoke make install using the upstream Makefile
which obviously is not applicable to your situation since there is no
upstream Makefile (or even a source build dir) to begin with.
HTH,
Jow
signature.asc
Description:
Applied in r38525 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
NAK. I'm working on it and will rather disable libpam support.
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r38445 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r38446 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r38447 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r38448 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r38449 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r38450 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r38451 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r38413 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r38413, thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r38414 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r38415, thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r38416 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
comments inline.
On 11.10.2013 12:30, Bruno Randolf wrote:
Signed-off-by: Bruno Randolf b...@einfach.org
---
net/pptpd/Makefile| 3 +++
net/pptpd/files/pptpd.init| 40 ++--
net/pptpd/files/pptpd.uciconf | 8
3 files
Applied in r38417 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
comments inline.
RFC3527 link selection sub-option is used to select the uplink
interface of
dhcrelay in cases where the DHCP server does not know how to reach the
dhcrelay
based on the DHCP range. This can happen in weird network configurations like
Mesh networks.
Signed-off-by:
Hi,
comments inline.
Add more options to dhcrelay UCI and init script:
- enabled
- interfaces: Listen interfaces
- relay_mode: What to do about packets that already have a relay option
Also mark /etc/config/dhcrelay as conffile
Signed-off-by: Bruno Randolf b...@einfach.org
---
Hello Bruno.
Are these patches backports from trunk? If not please rebase them on
current trunk so we can apply them there and backport to 12.09 afterwards.
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
Applied in r38353 with slightly modified commit message.
Thanks.
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Applied in r38356 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r38357 with slightly modified commit message and changed
source url.
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
I do not understand the purpose of this patch.
Can you outline such a callsite which is attempting to read the type
attribute?
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Hi Paul.
I'd really like to hear from whoever is maintaining
the build recipe and patches for opkg within OpenWRT to ensure that we
help each other out rather than stepping on each others toes.
That would be me. I already planned to give current opkg git a try soon
and see how we can merge our
Applied in r38358 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Package moved to openwrt-routing and update merged on top - thank you.
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Hi.
Yeah I agree, but bird should be removed from openwrt-packages in that case.
I can handle that, ping me if a decision has been made.
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
Hi.
I understand the backwards compatibility issue but the problem with the
fallback to name approach is that there is no clean way to have a zone
called name that is *not* covering a network called wan automatically.
I'd rather change the documentation on this and maybe add a uci-defaults
WTF, was soll der Mist und wie schalte ich das aus?
What about providing some details? X does not work. WTF does not
exactly make me want to answer your question.
Whats the current configuration? Whats the output if ifstatus wan or
whatever name your IPv6 PPPoE enabled ifaces uses.
Also note
/etc/firewall.user:
(while true; do ip -6 route add default dev pppoe-wan; sleep 60; done)
/dev/null 21
This is the right place (on Debian) for it:
/etc/ppp/ipv6-up.d/defaultroute:
ip -6 route add default via $PPP_REMOTE dev $PPP_IFACE
This is just an ugly hack.
The proper way would
NACK to this patch, comments below.
-set network.lan.ip6assign='60'
+set network.lan.ip6assign='64'
Cosmetical change, not needed. If less than a /60 is available, it will
use less.
-set network.wan6='interface'
-set network.wan6.ifname='@wan'
+set network.wan6='alias'
+set
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Applied in r37168 - thanks!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlHVqesACgkQdputYINPTPMKHwCfaJscFWqUQLolmjRIJOfodWMJ
On 18.06.2013 15:49, Hans Dedecker wrote:
Since the upstep to firewall3 in the attitude adjustment branch I notice
NAT masquerade issues when the masq_dest and/or masq_src parameters are
set to 0.0.0.0/0 http://0.0.0.0/0 in the zone topic.
Don't do it then? Setting a value of 0.0.0.0/0 is not
Fixed with https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/36960,
https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/36962
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r36943 with various modifications to the shell code (no
functional changes).
Thank you,
Jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r36944, thank you!
~ jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi.
In principle the patch looks okay but I think it should not depend on
uhttpd specifically as some users might want to run the CGI programs on
top of another httpd.
~ Jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
here the full/updated snippet:
http://intercity-vpn.de/files/openwrt/init_kmodules_loader_without_iptables.sh.txt
Or, you know, simply comment the relevant modules out in /etc/modules.d/ ...
~ Jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
On 28.05.2013 14:56, Mathias Kresin wrote:
With this patch, the --interface-name option of dnsmasq is used to add
a DNS record for the openwrt box. Starting with dnsmasq 2.67test5 it
does even work for ipv6 addresses. IPv6 addresses with an expired
lifetime will be automatically replaced with
Hi,
did you set available=1 and no_device=1 in the
proto_pppoi_init_config() procedure?
Take a look how pptp is instantiated, that one is a device-less protocol
as well.
~ Jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
On 05.05.2013 18:46, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
How do I compile a target object when there is a toolchain object of the
same name?
For example sed. I want it to make the target version, not the host
toolchain one.
make package/sed/{clean,compile} V=s
~ Jow
Hi Serge,
merged for AA in r36557 with a slightly changed commit message.
Thanks!
~ Jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r36509 - thanks!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Merged in r36510 - thanks!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Merged in r36512 - thank you!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi.
I merged the required changes in r36513 however I did not take the patch
as-is but removed the gpio_request() fro mthe patch introducing it
instead of removing it from another patch.
~ Jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
Merged in r36518
(http://nbd.name/gitweb.cgi?p=uci.git;a=commitdiff;h=b42ee8f21842fab41a4cdf2796bb1b3f42a7)
- thanks!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
This change got merged in r36412 - thanks!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On 30.04.2013 13:55, Adam Gensler wrote:
I noticed the following message when restarting the fw on trunk:
Warning: Unable to locate ipset utility, disabling ipset support
So, I decided to poke around the fw3 source code on gitweb here:
http://nbd.name/gitweb.cgi?p=firewall3.git;a=summary
IMHO the logic should be:
if wl $WIFIDEV bands | grep -q 802.11a ; then
channel=36
else
channel=1
fi
The logic should be:
channel=11
if wl $WIFIDEV bands | grep -q 802.11a ; then
channel=36
fi
This brings it in line with mac80211
On 18.04.2013 11:17, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Hardcoding channel number to 11 is a bad idea, it may be even not
available on some devices. If there are two single-band radios, the
one for 5GHz doesn't have 11 channel.
That patch makes the Broadcom default wireless config generation
inconsistent
The OpenWrt Release Team would like to announce the
final Attitude Adjustment Release (12.09).
___ __
| |.-.-.-.| | | |..| |_
| - || _ | -__| || | | || _|| _|
|___|| __|_|__|__||||__|
Merged in r36414 - thanks!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Merged in r36415 - thanks!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r36398 - thanks!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r36397 - thanks!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r36399 - thanks!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r36400 - thanks!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in http://luci.subsignal.org/trac/changeset/9812 - thanks!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r36401 - thanks!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
I merged your patch in:
http://nbd.name/gitweb.cgi?p=luci2/netifd.git;a=commitdiff;h=2008ae9a80fb82b0018fd510043c291b58e7cc46
... and set the default prio to 0x7FFF in:
http://nbd.name/gitweb.cgi?p=luci2/netifd.git;a=commitdiff;h=0f0fa4f1c8cb4f793c31edd1420483e9e325
It will appear in
Merged in r36377
(http://nbd.name/gitweb.cgi?p=uci.git;a=commitdiff;h=6c71e7ee00c98eec9bd1cc92b903738863aebd57)
Your mailer mangled the patch, therefore it was ingored previously.
~ Jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Merged in r36377
(http://nbd.name/gitweb.cgi?p=uci.git;a=commitdiff;h=1e1f503d8fb8336da22029faaa1a7252bed22976)
Your mailer mangled the patch, therefore it was ingored previously.
~ Jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
NAK. These rules are *not* duplicate, note that one specified src_ip,
the other dest_ip.
~ Jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi.
I am not a expert of automake and libtools then I am struggling in
fixing the problem, why does it try to use a path which contains a
system library and not a cross compiled library ? How can I modify
this behaviours ??!
The Makefile currently in SVN contains a PKG_FIXUP:=autoreconf which
Changeset 35998 introduced a new option reflection_src which may be
internal or external and defaults to internal.
When set to internal it behaves like the old firewall scripts where
the internal networks address is taken as SNAT source. When set to
external the external networks IP address is
There is a way to do that automatically ??!
Not at the moment.
~ Jow
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
What about turning the reflection parameter from a bool into a string
value which is either src or dest.
If set to src it would reflect to the ip of the network referenced by
option src (i.e. the external/wan one) and if set to dest it would
use the ip of the network referenced by option dest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Should be fixed with r35969.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlE+ROAACgkQdputYINPTPPpsgCgg4slWCSslm7joeaggVlSe3dL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
yes I did indeed change set as some user requested such a change
stating that mapping the reflection to the wan ip would more closely
resemble the behaviour of OEM firmwares.
I'll look into making it configurable during the next few days,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ahh. Because I don't want to use the dns servers dhcp gives to me.
What about simply setting option peerdns 0 on the dhcp interface then?
~ Jow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
NAK. This file is there to support sysupgrade on devices that do not
have opkg installed.
~ Jow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
just a random thought...
I wonder if it would make sense to set a lower priority by default
(while still keeping this option to allow overriding again).
~ Jow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG
601 - 700 of 1241 matches
Mail list logo
