Hi,
at the moment we need to set countrycode in different formats for
madwifi (e.g. 276) and broadcom (e.g. DE). I would suggest to add the
following patch which translates countrycodes from two-letter codes to
numeric codes for madwifi. Imo that would make things easier and more
consistent.
What
On 06.03.2011 23:55, Jim Henderson wrote:
> /usr/sbin/uhttpd: can't resolve symbol '__fpcmp_parts_f'
There is already a ticket for that: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/8959
Regards, soma
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwr
Hi again,
because there was no reply to my mail from 22.01.2011 i post it here
again, hoping it will get a bit more attention this time.
--- Original Message ---
Hi,
at the moment we need to set countrycode in different formats for
madwifi (e.g. 276) and broadcom (e.g. DE). I would suggest to a
On 14.05.2011 03:48, Hanno Schupp wrote:
> iptables: No chain/target/match by that name.
>
Hi Hanno
the problem was that xt_ipp2p could not be loaded because some symbols
were missing:
xt_ipp2p: Unknown symbol xtnu_register_match
xt_ipp2p: Unknown symbol xtnu_unregister_match
xt_ipp2p: Unknown
Hi,
the attached patch makes ipcalc.sh accept IP/Netmask combinations in
CIDR notation. Before you could only do:
# sh ipcalc.sh 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 1 10
IP=192.168.0.0
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
BROADCAST=192.168.0.255
NETWORK=192.168.0.0
PREFIX=24
START=192.168.0.1
END=192.168.0.11
with this
I had the same requirement for a connection with eduroam and came up
with the same solution. I also tested the patch works. Should be commited.
Reviewed-by: Manuel Munz
On 07.04.2016 18:21, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> The wpa_supplicant supports an "anonymous_identity" field
On 07.04.2016 18:22, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> Add support for setting the "anonymous_identity" field on EAP type
> networks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin O'Connor
> ---
>
Tested, worked.
Reviewed-By: Manuel Munz
Thanks, commited in http://luci.subsignal.org/trac/changeset/10467/
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
this patch adds uci config style for wshaper and also fixes a small
problem with the loaded modules (act_police needs to be loaded).
Signed-off-by: Manuel Munz
Index: feeds/packages/net/wshaper/files/wshaper.htb
===
--- feeds
On 29.06.2011 15:00, Manuel Munz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch adds uci config style for wshaper and also fixes a small
> problem with the loaded modules (act_police needs to be loaded).
>
> Signed-off-by: Manuel Munz
>
Oh, forgot to ask to backport this change to backf
on both trunk and backfire branch and works as
expected.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Munz
Index: target/linux/brcm47xx/base-files/etc/init.d/netconfig
===
--- target/linux/brcm47xx/base-files/etc/init.d/netconfig (Revision 28191
Hi
this patch fixes 3 things in the imagebuilder, one of them is literally big:
When running package_install the imagebuilder generates package list(s),
which are stored in $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/lib/opkg/lists/ and then copied
into the final image, which wastes around 200kB in the resulting image
(or
On 09.09.2011 18:05, Peter Naulls wrote:
> On 09/09/2011 08:42 AM, Manuel Munz wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> this patch fixes 3 things in the imagebuilder, one of them is
>> literally big:
>>
>> When running package_install the imagebuilder generates package list(s),
&
On 09.09.2011 19:22, Peter Naulls wrote:
> On 09/09/2011 10:02 AM, Manuel Munz wrote:
>
>> But why is CLEAN_IPKG not
>> selected by default? And can we have a backport of this to backfire?
>
> Why should it be? If you want it on, select it. It's the same option
On 07.09.2011 15:28, Manuel Munz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch adds the correct vlan definitions for the Siemens SE505v2. It
> applies to trunk as well as backfire (please apply here too). On
> backfire this also patches brcm-2,4, because brcm47xx base-files is just
> symlinked to
On 20.10.2011 22:17, Daniel A. Nagy wrote:
> On 10/20/2011 09:08 PM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
>> Taking notice of https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/20925 that looks like
>> the bits needs to manage the balancing and failover for multiple WAN
>> ports, which is great.
>>
>> Is there any corresponding
On 01.11.2011 10:24, ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm upgrading olsrd to 0.6.2
>
> I should keep this patch ? It was introduced because the output is
> parsed by some web interface ?
> https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/olsrd/patches/200-txtinfo_gateways_formatting.patch
sysupgrade.
Please consider adding these changes to backfire, too.
Regards, Manuel
Signed-off-by: Manuel Munz
Index: net/tinc/files/tinc.init
===
--- net/tinc/files/tinc.init (Revision 0)
+++ net/tinc/files/tinc.init (Revision 0
Plase use this patch instead of the last one. It uses 47 instead of 62
for the start order in the init script, this makes sure tinc is up
before other services need the interfaces tinc creates.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Munz
Index: net/tinc/files/tinc.init
On 05.11.2011 01:18, Manuel Munz wrote:
> Plase use this patch instead of the last one. It uses 47 instead of 62
> for the start order in the init script, this makes sure tinc is up
> before other services need the interfaces tinc creates.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manuel Munz
>
On 06.11.2011 12:43, Linus Lüssing wrote:
> Hi Manuel, hi list,
>
> What do you think about maybe making it a little bit more uci-ish?
> This should make it easier to integrate into LuCI later for instance.
> And give the possibility to reconfigure things via the uci command line
> tool and script
meters provided in
> /etc/config/tinc afterwards (the user needs to take care to not specify
> non-list parameters in both uci and native config).
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Lüssing
Reviewed by: Manuel Munz
Patch looks good and works, i'd like to see this getting submitted.
Regards
On 28.12.2011 12:21, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
> I do not think this will work better. If crond is not killed by the OOM
> killer, then the watchdog keeps being kept alive, and you end up in the
> same situation. Rather I think we need some kind of software monitoring
> by a daemon like upstart wh
On 16.03.2012 12:47, 马进 wrote:
> Is "kmod-ath9k_2.6.32.27+2011-12-01-1_ar71xx.ipk" equal to "kmod-ath9k"?
> Are they the same?
>
Yes. There is just the kernel version appended.
Regards, Manuel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
Without this patch imagebuilder fails to build images for bcm4705*
targets which depend on kmod-ssb-gige because no kmod-package was built.
I don't have any hardware to test if it is still properly built into the
images, so please review/test.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Munz
Index: target/
On 11.11.2012 18:38, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>
> Just adding some random file to the package to make it generated is
> not the correct approach. I removed the kmod-ssb-gige package entirely
> in r34150 and r34151, now the problem should be solved.
>
> Hauke
Sorry for the bad patch. And yes, images
On 29.11.2012 06:52, tpu01yzx wrote:
> hi everyone, I have some problem and ask for help: maybe the lastest
> kmod-ipv6 is not compatible with Dreambox 2011, so can you give a
> compatible one ? or is there any solution to solve the ipv6 problem ? thanks.
[...]
>
> Downloading
> http://down
On 20.12.2012 11:16, . Elvis wrote:
> hi all, How to achieve multiple languages in html(templete/view)?
> or can use i18n to achieve in html?
>
> example: <%:Restore
> backup%>:
> how to translate (Restore backup) wording to different language!
>
>
> thanks all
>
>
>
old temporary config this problem is solved. Then we should
also remove the temporary config for a net which is stopped to free up
some bytes in memory.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Munz
Index: feeds/packages/net/tinc/files/tinc.init
sible.
[1] https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=34082
Regards, soma
Signed-off-by: Manuel Munz
Index: target/linux/brcm47xx/profiles/WGT634U.mk
===
--- target/linux/brcm47xx/profiles/WGT634U.mk (Revision 35506)
+++ target/
On 18.02.2013 16:47, Permadi Witjaksono wrote:
> I don't know howto submit patch in a proper way, but on my attachment I
> submit patch for MR3420v2 against trunk revision 35287.
>
This might help: https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/SubmittingPatches
Regards, Manuel
signature.asc
Description: OpenP
On 20.03.2013 12:11, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> with is the supposed way to do this, could'nt find
> any documentation, so we tried this:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> . /usr/share/libubox/jshn.sh
>
> JSON="$( wget -qO - "$URL" )"
> eval $( jshn -r "$JSON" )
>
> echo "Status is $JSON_VAR_status"
> echo "Number
On 28.03.2013 12:30, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> I thought I read a message either here or on the user list many weeks
> ago that the build farm was being spun up to do a final AA release. But
> still there is no release. No new RC.
>
> According to http://downloads.openwrt.org/attitude_adjustment
On 11.04.2013 23:10, Peter Lawler wrote:
>
> Given the place that OpenWRT sits in people's networks, I would strongly
> encourage the development team to consider moving the download system to
> forcing HTTPS connections and ditching MD5 for SHA-2.
>
> Regards,
>
> Pete.
I agree with most of wh
A buffer overflow was found in Tinc [1] which was fixed in version
1.0.21. These patches upgrade the tinc package to the fixed version for
attitude and trunk.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Munz
[1]
http://sitsec.net/blog/2013/04/22/stack-based-buffer-overflow-in-the-vpn-software-tinc-for-authenticated
On 10.06.2013 20:13, Ben West wrote:
> My understanding is that OpenWRT Attitude Adjustment, along with current
> versions of trunk, are not expected to run in any reliable way under less
> than 32MB of RAM. In particular, the v3.x kernel is not supported for so
> little memory, and the OpenWRT de
Adds a missing symbol in the kernel config for x86/kvm_guest in the
Attitude Adjustment branch.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Munz
Index: target/linux/x86/kvm_guest/config-3.3
===
--- target/linux/x86/kvm_guest/config-3.3 (Revision 38460
Hi,
i needed a database to be able to implement a selector where users can
choose their router model and from that parameters like
target/subtarget/profile/others are automatically set for the selected
model. A first demo for this can be seen here (where it says WIP):
http://testing.meshkit.freif
Thanks for all your comments,
there was some valuable input and things worth considering:
* i like the idea to give start of sale and EOL dates
* Integrating more information directly into the build system also
sounds like a good idea, though i'm not really sure how that would be
done on a per mo
On 09.12.2013 14:18, Daniel Golle wrote:
> what about devices which work in old (brcm-2.4) builds but are no longer
> supported in recent builds? I we should reference a per-version status (e.g.
> 10.03 'not supported', 12.09 'supported', trunk confirmed to work with/since
> r). Ideally, openw
On 10.01.2014 21:01, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We would like to improve the board detection for bcm47xx devices. We
> converted many devices to the new code, but some are still missing,
> because we do not have a nvram dump of these devices.
> We would like to get a nvram dump of such device
On 10.01.2014 21:01, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We would like to improve the board detection for bcm47xx devices. We
> converted many devices to the new code, but some are still missing,
> because we do not have a nvram dump of these devices.
> We would like to get a nvram dump of such device
42 matches
Mail list logo