Hauke,
I have been using 21.02 for the last 4 weeks and I found 2 importants issues:
1) OpenVPN up/down:
https://forum.openwrt.org/t/openwrt-21-02-openvpn-client-up-down-scripts-configuration-ignored/91126
There are proposed fixes, but I have not seen these yet in the latest 21.02
branch.
I que
Just to clarify: 'Right to Repair' is already a law in the European Union. It
is beginning to be enforced from 2021 and it will go through further evolution
steps.
On 03/04/2021, 22:40, "openwrt-devel on behalf of Alberto Bursi"
wrote:
A few days ago, Louis Rossmann, a relatively famous
Why is ar71xx no longer going to be supported?
This includes Netgear WNDR-3700-v4 which is a very popular and reliable
router in the OpenWRT community.
On 20/08/2020 14:32, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
Hi all,
I've sent a few reminders about this topic already, and in yesterday's virtual
meeti
On 15/08/2020 18:34, Paul Oranje wrote:
Op 11 aug. 2020, om 02:30 heeft Mauro Mozzarelli het
volgende geschreven:
On 10/08/2020 10:08, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
-Original Message-
From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
On Behalf Of Mauro Mozzarelli
Sent
On 10/08/2020 10:08, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
-Original Message-
From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
On Behalf Of Mauro Mozzarelli
Sent: Montag, 10. August 2020 10:36
To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Subject: Re: Policy on BUILD_PATENTED
On 09/08
On 09/08/2020 12:44, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Mauro Mozzarelli writes:
On 09/08/2020 03:35, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
I believe OpenWrt should not even *consider* placing its umbrella
organization(s) -- which are based on the U.S. -- in legal risk
without at least contacting them first and
On 09/08/2020 03:35, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On 08/08/2020 17:56, Rosen Penev wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 1:37 PM Mauro Mozzarelli
wrote:
Since OpenWrt is NOT US Based and in fact it appears to be mostly
supported with EU contributions, we should be following the more
liberal
Since OpenWrt is NOT US Based and in fact it appears to be mostly
supported with EU contributions, we should be following the more liberal
EU policies.
Personally I am against software patents and I campaigned for the
decision that the EU parliament took to ban them despite significant
lobby
This bug has been confirmed by a few reporters. I was wondering if
anyone is looking into it and if any further feedback is needed.
I am happy to help with testing if a developer would like to get in touch.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-deve
I have BT Home Hub 5 routers.
I have just built release 9290.
Something happened to the broadband LED configuration between release
8495 and 9290
In 9290 LED associated to device pppoa-wan no longer works (it remains
off once the pppoa-wan connection is established), however if, after
havin
I am in a similar situation. I have been waiting for over a year for the
linux-virtual-server pull request. I think it expired.
Eventually I gave up.
On 26/06/18 20:33, Nick wrote:
Hi,
I added some pull request that add the ht and vht support in the probe
requests in the ubus calls.
https:/
Neither it is to post an arrogant reply which is the only type of reply
I get usually from Jo-Philipp as this isn't the first time. You reap
what you seed guys.
On 28/05/18 14:34, John Crispin wrote:
On 28/05/18 15:29, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
Hi,
This does not make sense, is the alternati
This does not make sense, is the alternative to write off openwrt?
Because if ADSL + PPPoA do not work, then it is useless.
As a minimum I would expect a developer to look at the commits between
r6080 and r7050 to see what has changed and roll-back.
Also if you need any further information, j
Hello,
I reported https://bugs.openwrt.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=1567
Which is a blocking issue for BT Home Hub 5 as pppoa no longer connects.
Is anyone looking into it?
Thanks.
Mauro
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.ope
My query relates to Type A which is a Lantiq Atheros chipset.
On 29/11/16 17:58, Dave Taht wrote:
since broadcom was sold to another company recently is there any sign
we'll see open drivers for the BCM4360 ?
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Mauro M. wrote:
Hello,
From the OpenWrt wiki pag
Since the capability is implemented in software you might be testing the
limit of your router's CPU i/o speed.
On 04/11/16 14:13, Bruno Antunes wrote:
Hi all,
Old thread but I think the issue is still present.
I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards.
To make it work both ca
Answering to myself for everyone:
After some hacking I found the code was moved to legacy.mk
On 28/10/16 15:18, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
Hello,
I have seen that the new trunk code has some substantial changes to
Netgear WNDR3700/4300 memory map configuration.
The Makefile used to hold the
Hello,
I have seen that the new trunk code has some substantial changes to
Netgear WNDR3700/4300 memory map configuration.
The Makefile used to hold the memory maps and that now has disappeared
thus the following patch that I created to get the whole flash for the
filesystem no longer applie
Hi,
I am building openwrt from trunk. Since a git fresh pull I ran about 3
weeks ago I have been unable to build trunk as it fails always as follows:
make[4]: Entering directory
`/net20/router/openwrt/trunk/feeds/luci/modules/luci-base/src'
rm -f po2lmo parser.so version.lua *.o
cc-c -o
On Wed, March 16, 2016 12:06, John Crispin wrote:
[...]
> - openssl updated to 1.0.2f
Thanks for the update, why not upgrade to the latest openssl 1.0.2g? It has been
released already a few weeks ago, it fixes a security vulnerability and the
change would
have had no regression impact.
_
I would like to modify dynamically the modules being built depending on the
kernel
version. I thought I could build KCONFIG using ifeq. But I cannot find anything
that I
can use to determine which kernel is being built.
So far I tried:
ifeq ($(call kernel_patchver_gt,4.0.0),1) # does not wor
I would like to modify dynamically the modules being built depending on the
kernel
version. I thought I could build KCONFIG using ifeq. But I cannot find anything
that I can use to determine which kernel is being built.
So far I tried:
ifeq ($(call kernel_patchver_gt,4.0.0),1) # does not work
I am trying to find the syntax by reverse engineering the mk files I find, but
I cannot
find enough options. So I need some help.
So far I have seen full linux versions like LINUX_4_1 or LINUX_4_4.
What if the rule applies to all linux 4.* or linux 3.*?
Can I use LINUX_4 or LINUX_4_X (guessing a
Ooops!
The ftp module is in kernel 3, but not in kernel 4 for which the patch was
built.
Is there a way to include modules conditionally dependent on the kernel version?
On Fri, March 11, 2016 12:45, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> seems that change fails all builds now due to undeclared symbo
Hi Felix,
Thank you for your feedback.
What you are saying does make sense to me, but it makes sense also to keep ipvs
together with iptables as they are both part of netfilter, which is my
preference.
I would like to hear some other opinions.
Mauro
On Wed, March 9, 2016 12:00, Felix Fietkau
All,
I have been having conversations with John on whether to include ipvs and
ipvsadm in
trunk or github. Initially I did not know of github and thanks to John's
patience now I
have a better understanding of the differences between the two.
IP Virtual server is provided by kernel modules that
services of
the real servers to appear as a virtual service on a single IP address.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Mozzarelli
diff --git a/package/kernel/linux/modules/netfilter.mk
b/package/kernel/linux/modules/netfilter.mk
index a0a19b2..a509ab7 100644
--- a/package/kernel/linux/modules/netfilter.mk
+++ b
services of the real servers to appear as a virtual service on a single IP
address.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Mozzarelli
diff --git a/package/kernel/linux/modules/netfilter.mk
b/package/kernel/linux/modules/netfilter.mk index a0a19b2..a509ab7 100644
--- a/package/kernel/linux/modules/netfilter.mk
+++ b
This ipvsadm package contains:
- uci ipvs sample configuration file
- ipvsadm service startup/shutdown script
- scheduler checking real servers' availability and re-configuring ipvs tables
accordingly
Dependencies:
- ipvs kernel modules
- ipvsadm tool
Signed-off-by: Mauro Mozzarelli
This package contains:
- ipvsadm utility to configure IP VS tables, virtual and real servers
Dependencies:
- ipvs kernel modules configuration
Signed-off-by: Mauro Mozzarelli
diff --git a/package/network/utils/ipvsadm/Makefile
b/package/network/utils/ipvsadm/Makefile
new file mode 100644
services of
the real servers to appear as a virtual service on a single IP address.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Mozzarelli
diff --git a/package/kernel/linux/modules/netfilter.mk
b/package/kernel/linux/modules/netfilter.mk
index a0a19b2..a509ab7 100644
--- a/package/kernel/linux/modules/netfilter.mk
+++ b
Hello,
I am re-submitting new and improved versions of the IP Virtual Server patches
These now are provided in two separate modules:
1) ipvs: includes the ip_vs kernel modules configuration (netfilter.mk patch)
2) ipvsadm: 1/2 includes the Makefile and patches to build ipvsadm tool v1.28
All,
I am re-submitting new and improved versions of the IP Virtual Server patches.
There will be two separate packages
1) ipvs: includes the ip_vs kernel modules configuration (netfilter.mk patch)
2) ipvsadm: 1/2 contains the Makefile and patches to build plain ipvsadm tool
v1.28
2/
bipvs") the variable isn't passed along, hence the issue
with ipvsadm. In our case the only thing that works is to set the parameter with
-D in CFLAGS
Best regards,
Mauro
On Wed, March 2, 2016 10:16, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
>
> On Wed, March 2, 2016 09:27, Yousong Zhou wrote
ex 000..506dd32
--- /dev/null
+++ b/package/network/utils/ipvsadm/files/etc/init.d/ipvsadm
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+#!/bin/sh /etc/rc.common
+
+########
+# Author: Mauro Mozzarelli
+# Description: builds ipvs configuration from uci ope
8<
This package contains:
- ipvsadm utility to configure IP VS tables, virtual and real servers
Dependencies:
- ipvs kernel modules configuration (patch previously posted)
Signed-off-by: Mauro Mozzarelli
8<
diff --git a/package/network/utils/i
On Wed, March 2, 2016 09:27, Yousong Zhou wrote:
> On 2 March 2016 at 17:15, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need to pass environment variables to a Makefile (ipvsadm-1.26). I tried
>> using MAKE_ARGS
>> as documented on the OpenWrt wiki but it is igno
Hi,
I need to pass environment variables to a Makefile (ipvsadm-1.26). I tried
using MAKE_ARGS
as documented on the OpenWrt wiki but it is ignored.
Please could anyone let me know how to?
Mauro
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwr
because
1) it provides finely working Load Balancing Capability and
2) it would be an incentive for further improvements and eventually the
implementation of luci configuration.
Mauro
commit 56e49cc8ef439ff7e1c225c3902654a4716e1a3f
Author: Mauro Mozzarelli
Date: Wed Feb 24 18:18:25 2016 +
All,
Part 2/3 includes the ipvsadm package tool only.
It depends on the ipvs kernel modules patch 1/3
This patch includes code and build improvements following the review.
Mauro
commit 0774e5f9347943d4677f596d72cfadfc84dffcb9
Author: Mauro Mozzarelli
Date: Wed Feb 24 18:12:00 2016 +
part does not have dependencies and
it can be included without the following 2
parts.
Mauro
commit 5430316fd97a81b4759445b19e1a1cee89adb7c6
Author: Mauro Mozzarelli
Date: Wed Feb 24 18:09:25 2016 +
This ipvs package adds Linux IP Virtual Server capability to OpenWRT
IPVS (IP
Yousong,
Thank you for your suggestions.
Please see my notes below after your comments
Mauro
On Wed, February 24, 2016 13:31, Yousong Zhou wrote:
> yousong
>
>
> On 24 February 2016 at 03:57, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> Part 2/3 include
pts please feel free just not to push this
last patch into the mainstream trunk.
Mauro
Author: Mauro Mozzarelli
Date: Tue Feb 23 19:30:59 2016 +
This ipvs package adds Linux IP Virtual Server capability to OpenWRT
IPVS (IP Virtual Server) implements transport-layer load balancing i
s NAT (and I would not advise to do so because
the
real servers would not be able to track the original client's source IP) I have
not
implemented it.
Should you find issues with the scripts please feel free just not to push this
last
patch into the mainstream trunk.
Mauro
Author: Mauro
All,
Part 2/3 includes the ipvsadm tool only.
It depends on the ipvs kernel modules patch 1/3
Mauro
Author: Mauro Mozzarelli
Date: Tue Feb 23 19:22:51 2016 +
This ipvsadm package adds Linux IP Virtual Server capability to OpenWRT
IPVS (IP Virtual Server) implements transport
All,
Please find enclosed the first of three patches to add IP Virtual Server
capability to OpenWRT
This patch adds configuration for IP Virtual Server kernel modules
This part does not have dependencies and it can be included without the
following 2 parts.
Mauro
Author: Mauro Mozzarelli
I am not having success with git, so I will submit this new feature as patch. I
hope this is acceptable to all.
commit c7d7abd075117739e6a784df5477a3e66a0533bd
Author: Mauro Mozzarelli
Date: Mon Feb 22 18:49:28 2016 +
This ipvs package adds Linux IP Virtual Server capability to
I was wondering if somebody could guide me step by step through the
process necessary to submit a new package for OpenWRT with SUCCESS.
I have created the ipvs package to provide Load Balancer capabilities to
OpenWRT.
The package consists of:
- a change to package/kernel/linux/modules/netfilter.m
48 matches
Mail list logo
