On 11/2/2017 1:44 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
I agree, that there were no warning signs on the public mailing list.
As I said before, all history now; discussing it further serves no purpose.
- Mike
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
On 11/1/2017 5:18 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
This raises some more questions: which terms and conditions did people
have
to approve to get an @openwrt.org address? Where can these terms and
conditions be found? Is every email sent from such an address supposed to
be discussed and approved by
On 6/13/2017 10:43 PM, John Crispin wrote:
On 13/06/17 21:58, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/28/2017 11:56 PM, John Crispin wrote:
Hi,
here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
that post
Careful, the ubicom32 target that was removed predates the ip8k chipset; it was
removed both due to lack of maintainer and because it required a strict nommu
userspace -- no calls to fork() and avoid mmap() or risk fragmenting available
memory.
The ip8k was the first Ubicom chipset to feature
You're close; ultra is the name given to the proprietary code that runs on all
the threads not running linux. The ubicom chipsets are hardware multithreaded
with 8-12 threads -- SMT, think of it as SMP but context switching instead of
concurrent.
Ultra performs the board initialization and
In all honesty I'd suggest opening a ticket on trac; I'm not sure who
wrote the page suggesting they be emailed, but it defeats the purpose
of having a bug tracking system.
As far as the topic of being a developer and getting commit access
goes, it's pretty straight forward; don't ask for commit
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 06:46:10PM +0100, Steven Barth wrote:
Why emulate a 1 dimensional limited configuration system for all platforms,
with a maximum capacity of 32kiB just because ONLY some old broadcom based
routers use it?
Right.
NVRAM was usually a 32k block of consecutive name=value
It has 50k or so of RAM ...
It won't run Linux.
The only thing you can do with so little ram is boot into a custom
application that controls the hardware directly.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:38:24PM +0200, wlanmac wrote:
But if you are using the Gargoyle approach - that is not bad but simply a
different approach - you have to mess up with Shell and learn JavaScript or
in your case *yourFrontendLanguage*.
True. But, I'd argue that JavaScript
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 02:21:06PM +0200, Steven Van Ingelgem wrote:
The once in italic I believe I can remove, but can someone please confirm
this because I don't want to brick another modem ;-)
If you start a fresh build and leave the package selection at defaults
you'll get only slightly
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 06:46:23PM +0200, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
wouldt it be better (for understanding) to do something like:
while read NUL MEM NUL; do
[ $MEM != used: ] {
MEM=$(( $MEM / 2 )) # filling var MEM with
break
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:14:08PM +0200, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
I've also added one more netmsg and moved the
netmsg direct into the function, for not having
two different places for the broadcast-address.
Signed-off-by: Bastian Bittorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Index:
12 matches
Mail list logo
