Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] Talks between OpenWrt and LEDE

On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:06:22 -0500 "Hauke Mehrtens" wrote: > We had multiple meetings to find a solution to solve the problems > between the OpenWrt and the LEDE project and to discuss a possible > merge. Everyone with commit access to LEDE and all OpenWrt core > developers

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] Talks between OpenWrt and LEDE

On 12/25/2016 10:52 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote: OpenBikeShed? Love it! Though it's fair to observe that marketing (which this is at this point) is pretty much 100% bike-shedding. Cheers, Dana ___ openwrt-devel mailing list

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] Talks between OpenWrt and LEDE

On Dec 21, 2016, at 10:13 PM, Russell Senior wrote: >> "Florian" == Florian Fainelli writes: > >>> However, I also agree with Dave, Alberto and Stefan that a name >>> change may be a really smart way to communicate the fresh start of >>>

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] Talks between OpenWrt and LEDE

On 22/12/2016 09:58, David Lang wrote: > On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote: > >> On 22/12/2016 09:42, David Lang wrote: >>> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote: >>> > Yes, the name is pointing at a product that doesn't exist any longer, > but Deb and Ian aren't involved with

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] Talks between OpenWrt and LEDE

On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote: On 22/12/2016 09:42, David Lang wrote: On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote: Yes, the name is pointing at a product that doesn't exist any longer, but Deb and Ian aren't involved with Debian any longer either. At some point the fact that a name is

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] Talks between OpenWrt and LEDE

On 22/12/2016 09:42, David Lang wrote: > On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote: > >>> Yes, the name is pointing at a product that doesn't exist any longer, >>> but Deb and Ian aren't involved with Debian any longer either. At some >>> point the fact that a name is known matters far more than

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] Talks between OpenWrt and LEDE

On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote: Yes, the name is pointing at a product that doesn't exist any longer, but Deb and Ian aren't involved with Debian any longer either. At some point the fact that a name is known matters far more than the historical reasons for the name. a problem that

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] Talks between OpenWrt and LEDE

On 22/12/2016 09:36, David Lang wrote: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Dave Taht wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:29 PM, David Lang wrote: >>> On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Kathy Giori wrote: >>> From a PR perspective, I strongly suggest keeping the term OpenWrt as part of the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] Talks between OpenWrt and LEDE

> "Florian" == Florian Fainelli writes: >> However, I also agree with Dave, Alberto and Stefan that a name >> change may be a really smart way to communicate the fresh start of >> the project, a reboot, especially if the new name rides on the >> popularity of "OpenWRT".

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] Talks between OpenWrt and LEDE

On 12/21/2016 07:30 PM, Val Kulkov wrote: > > On 21 December 2016 at 17:01, Florian Fainelli > wrote: > > On 12/21/2016 01:46 PM, Alberto Bursi wrote: > > On 12/21/2016 09:42 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:29

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] Talks between OpenWrt and LEDE

On 21 December 2016 at 17:01, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 12/21/2016 01:46 PM, Alberto Bursi wrote: > > On 12/21/2016 09:42 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:29 PM, David Lang wrote: > >>> On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Kathy Giori wrote: > >>> >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] Talks between OpenWrt and LEDE

On 12/21/2016 01:46 PM, Alberto Bursi wrote: > On 12/21/2016 09:42 PM, Dave Taht wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:29 PM, David Lang wrote: >>> On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Kathy Giori wrote: >>> From a PR perspective, I strongly suggest keeping the term OpenWrt as part of the