Hi Boris,
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 05:00:54PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:40:14 +0200
> Daniel Golle wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:25:54AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > > On 28 August 2016 at 11:20, Boris Brezillon
> > >
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:25:54AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> On 28 August 2016 at 11:20, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 11:12:50 -0300
> > Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> >
> >> Daniel,
> >>
> >> Let's try to
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 04:20:59PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> I think Daniel wants something like:
>
> ubi.mtd=1 root=ubi0:rootfs
Yes, this is what I want :)
>
> or
>
> ubi.mtd=1 root=/dev/ubiblock0_1
This would already be a bit worse, as then I need to refer to the
rootfs volume using
Hi Ezequiel,
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:12:50AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> Let's try to tackle this from a different angle.
>
> On 27 August 2016 at 16:43, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > In an attempts to fix the flaws of the current set of
Hi Richard,
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 01:57:40PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> On 28.08.2016 13:44, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:28:18AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Ralph,
> >>
> >> On 28.08.2016 11:19, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
>
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 13:44:48 +0200
Daniel Golle wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:28:18AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Ralph,
> >
> > On 28.08.2016 11:19, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> > >>> On the other hand an initramfs can carry the logic to
Hi Richard,
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:28:18AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Ralph,
>
> On 28.08.2016 11:19, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> >>> On the other hand an initramfs can carry the logic to figure out
> >>> which to mount and is what I use for my self. The busybox based
> >>>
Hi Richard,
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 10:12:31 +0200
Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Ralph,
>
> On 28.08.2016 09:10, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> > Using CONFIG_CMDLINE or the dtb isn't an option either for dual
> > firmware devices. You'd have to provide two images, one for each
> >
Hi Richard,
On Sat, 27 Aug 2016 22:43:45 +0200
Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> On 27.08.2016 21:43, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > In an attempts to fix the flaws of the current set of UBI-related
> > patches we are carrying in OpenWrt, I re-wrote the way mounting
Hi Richard,
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 11:23:14PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> On 27.08.2016 23:06, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > thanks for the quick reply!
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:43:45PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Daniel,
> >>
> >> On
Hi Richard,
thanks for the quick reply!
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:43:45PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> On 27.08.2016 21:43, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > In an attempts to fix the flaws of the current set of UBI-related
> > patches we are carrying in OpenWrt, I
Hi!
In an attempts to fix the flaws of the current set of UBI-related
patches we are carrying in OpenWrt, I re-wrote the way mounting the
rootfs from UBI in OpenWrt/LEDE works. The main requirement I face
which cannot be easily addressed using other means which are already
available in the kernel
12 matches
Mail list logo