Please accept this patch.
On 28 Feb 2014 14:16, Vittorio G (VittGam) open...@vittgam.net wrote:
Hi,
This patch fixes a regression introduced with r38787.
Before patching:
/usr/sbin/ntpd -n -l -p server1 server2 server3 server4
After patching:
/usr/sbin/ntpd -n -l -p server1 -p server2 -p
This was fixed in r39935 I think:
http://openwrt.nanobit.org/changeset/39935/trunk/package/utils/busybox/files/sysntpd
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Weedy weedy2...@gmail.com wrote:
Please accept this patch.
On 28 Feb 2014 14:16, Vittorio G (VittGam) open...@vittgam.net wrote:
Hi,
This
On 2014-02-28 20:16, Vittorio G (VittGam) wrote:
Hi,
This patch fixes a regression introduced with r38787.
Before patching:
/usr/sbin/ntpd -n -l -p server1 server2 server3 server4
After patching:
/usr/sbin/ntpd -n -l -p server1 -p server2 -p server3 -p server4
Signed-off-by:
Dude, *you* committed this fix 10 days ago:
http://openwrt.nanobit.org/changeset/39935/trunk/package/utils/busybox/files/sysntpd
Why not take a look at patches that have been sitting in queue for
over a month instead:
http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/4931/
or at least this small bug fix:
On 2014-03-27 09:18, Catalin Patulea wrote:
Dude, *you* committed this fix 10 days ago:
http://openwrt.nanobit.org/changeset/39935/trunk/package/utils/busybox/files/sysntpd
Yeah, I don't keep track all the random minor changes that I merge while
I'm working on bigger stuff. I didn't have to try
Hi,
This patch fixes a regression introduced with r38787.
Before patching:
/usr/sbin/ntpd -n -l -p server1 server2 server3 server4
After patching:
/usr/sbin/ntpd -n -l -p server1 -p server2 -p server3 -p server4
Signed-off-by: Vittorio Gambaletta open...@vittgam.net
---
---
