Am Freitag, 8. März 2019, 07:28:21 CET schrieb Jo-Philipp Wich:
> Hi,
>
> tbh I don't really like the approach of arbitrarily defining "feed.mk"
> to be a change source. Can we extend this to take all toplevel *.mk
> files into consideration? I think this falls more in line with what
> people woul
Hi,
tbh I don't really like the approach of arbitrarily defining "feed.mk"
to be a change source. Can we extend this to take all toplevel *.mk
files into consideration? I think this falls more in line with what
people would expect.
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2019-03-07 17:28, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
Hi,
I do not understand the exact purpose of this patch. As far as I know,
there is no "feed.mk" anywhere in the LuCI repo.
Jo, you are correct, there is currently no such file. But I'm preparing
some PRs for LuCI and freifunk feed [1], [2] which wi
Hi,
I do not understand the exact purpose of this patch. As far as I know,
there is no "feed.mk" anywhere in the LuCI repo.
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https
The luci and freifunk feed having a common Makefile included by the
individual packages. Currently a change to this file will be ignored
when running "scripts/feeds update".
Add a check for a Makefile "feed.mk" in the root of a feed and include
this to the dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Sven Roedere
