Thanks for the effort. However, I personally think we should rather phase out
uclibc
completely and focus on musl which has a much cleaner codebase. I don't think
it is
worth in the long run to maintain support for both libcs given our limited
ressources.
Cheers,
Steven
__
uclibc-ng is used by buildroot sine June 2015
see http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2015-June/130161.html
maybe some OpenWrt users are interested to test
- fix ld-uclibc.so.1 breakage by symlinking to expected .so.0
- use 0.9.33.2 config, add add missing config symbols
- use buildroot
