On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 10:32 AM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>
> * send: switch handshake stamp to an atomic
>
> Rather than abusing the handshake lock, we're much better off just using
> a boring atomic64 for this. It's simpler and performs better. Also, while
> we're at it, we set the handshake
* send: switch handshake stamp to an atomic
Rather than abusing the handshake lock, we're much better off just using
a boring atomic64 for this. It's simpler and performs better. Also, while
we're at it, we set the handshake stamp both before and after the
calculations, in case the calculations
