Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/18] broadcom-wl: improvements for newer devices

2013-11-05 Thread Nathan Hintz
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 16:16:01 +0100 Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > Are you integrating Jow's suggesting into your patches and will you > resend them? > I will update the patches with Jow's suggestion, and resend them (probably won't be until this weekend though). -- Nathan ___

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/18] broadcom-wl: improvements for newer devices

2013-11-05 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 11/03/2013 12:59 AM, Nathan Hintz wrote: > The goal of this patch set is to provide improved support for newer devices > supported by the proprietary broadcom-wl driver. This includes some general > cleanup items, bug fixes, and some enhancements. I've tried to keep the > individual patches sm

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/18] broadcom-wl: improvements for newer devices

2013-11-03 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi Nathan, this series looks very well, ACK from me for merging it with a little comment on the wds interface naming; for mac80211 we use a dash as vif number separator, so wlan0 is vif 1 on phy0, wlan0-1 is vif 2 on phy 0 etc. I suggest using the same for wl, means wl0 is vif 1 on radio 0, wl0-1

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/18] broadcom-wl: improvements for newer devices

2013-11-02 Thread Nathan Hintz
The goal of this patch set is to provide improved support for newer devices supported by the proprietary broadcom-wl driver. This includes some general cleanup items, bug fixes, and some enhancements. I've tried to keep the individual patches small and focused on a single topic. Testing was limi