Sven Eckelmann writes:
> On Saturday 18 January 2014 01:14:28 Kalle Valo wrote:
>
>> > Just as general information to the state of ath10k, my current test showed
>> >
>> > some problems with it:
>> > * Samsung GT-I9300 only got horrible slow connections to an QCA9880 but
>> >
>> >an Intel
On Saturday 18 January 2014 01:14:28 Kalle Valo wrote:
> > I've picked up the patches and rebased them on top of the current master
> > branch/trunk.
>
> Where did you take the ath10k patches? ath10k is under heavy
> development, so I strongly recommend taking patches directly from
> ath-next bran
>> * Adhoc mode doesn't work at all
>
> That was with 10.1 firmware? AFAIK it doesn't support adhoc at all. I
> think we need to add a firmware feature flag to disable adhoc with that
> firmware.
I managed to try out the firmware version 999.999.0.636 on adhoc mode.
It works only after I fool the
(resending my mail due to a stupid rule in ath10k-devel, I need to be
subcribed before posting to that list)
Hi Sven,
adding ath...@lists.infradead.org.
Sven Eckelmann writes:
> Hi,
>
> support for ath10k cards was added a while ago to OpenWrt. Unfortunately, the
> actual 802.11ac support was
Hi,
support for ath10k cards was added a while ago to OpenWrt. Unfortunately, the
actual 802.11ac support was never added (patches on the mailing lists were
just ignored). This is a rather unpleasant situation when trying to get some
11ac test hardware working.
I've picked up the patches and r
