Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/1] mac80211: atomic64_read() already present on x86 processors

2011-07-12 Thread Philip Prindeville
On 7/12/11 10:51 PM, Daniel Dickinson wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 22:47:23 -0700 > Philip Prindeville wrote: > >> This is a fix to a regression introduced in r27572. >> >> Redux: thanks, Daniel, for pointing out the ifndef >> CONFIG_GENERIC_ATOMIC64 was backwards in sense. >> > > Er, no, I mean

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/1] mac80211: atomic64_read() already present on x86 processors

2011-07-12 Thread Daniel Dickinson
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 22:47:23 -0700 Philip Prindeville wrote: > This is a fix to a regression introduced in r27572. > > Redux: thanks, Daniel, for pointing out the ifndef > CONFIG_GENERIC_ATOMIC64 was backwards in sense. > Er, no, I meant that it was always true for x86 because x86 does other 3

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/1] mac80211: atomic64_read() already present on x86 processors

2011-07-12 Thread Philip Prindeville
This is a fix to a regression introduced in r27572. Redux: thanks, Daniel, for pointing out the ifndef CONFIG_GENERIC_ATOMIC64 was backwards in sense. Index: package/mac80211/patches/022-atomic64_backport.patch === --- package/mac80

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/1] mac80211: atomic64_read() already present on x86 processors

2011-07-12 Thread Philip Prindeville
This is a fix to a regression introduced in r27572. Here's a fix, but... my kernel doesn't have CONFIG_GENERIC_ATOMIC64 set... yet compat-wireless is still trying to compile and link it. Why is that? Index: package/mac80211/patches/022-atomic64_backport.patch ===