On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 13:07:43 +0200
Daniel Golle wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:50:59PM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:53:34 +0200
> > Daniel Golle wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > Are you planning to switch to initramfs and then load the ubi
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 04:13:53PM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:05:58 +0200
> Daniel Golle wrote:
>
> > Hi Ralph,
> >
> > the use of global variable ROOT_DEV is not guarded properly in the
> > patch auto-creating a ubiblock though this code needs to be
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:05:58 +0200
Daniel Golle wrote:
> Hi Ralph,
>
> the use of global variable ROOT_DEV is not guarded properly in the
> patch auto-creating a ubiblock though this code needs to be
> prevented from running when built as a module.
> Please try rebuilding with the patch attached
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:34:19 +0200
Daniel Golle wrote:
> Hi Ralph,
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 04:13:53PM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:05:58 +0200
> > Daniel Golle wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Ralph,
> > >
> > > the use of global variable ROOT_DEV is
Hi Ralph,
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 04:13:53PM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:05:58 +0200
> Daniel Golle wrote:
>
> > Hi Ralph,
> >
> > the use of global variable ROOT_DEV is not guarded properly in the
> > patch auto-creating a ubiblock though this code n
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:05:58 +0200
Daniel Golle wrote:
> Hi Ralph,
>
> the use of global variable ROOT_DEV is not guarded properly in the
> patch auto-creating a ubiblock though this code needs to be
> prevented from running when built as a module.
> Please try rebuilding with the pa
Hi Ralph,
the use of global variable ROOT_DEV is not guarded properly in the
patch auto-creating a ubiblock though this code needs to be
prevented from running when built as a module.
Please try rebuilding with the patch attached, if it resolves the issue
I'll commit a proper fix for that on LEDE'
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 12:53:41 +0200
Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> Hi Zoltan,
>
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 07:40:56 +0200
> Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
>
> > Daniel Golle wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:28:40PM +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
> > >
> > >> Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> > >>
> >
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 13:07:43 +0200
Daniel Golle wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:50:59PM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:53:34 +0200
> > Daniel Golle wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > Are you planning to switch to initramfs and then load the ubi
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:50:59PM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:53:34 +0200
> Daniel Golle wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Are you planning to switch to initramfs and then load the ubi and
> > ubifs modules in order to get a persistent rootfs?!
> > Remember tha
Hi Zoltan,
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 07:40:56 +0200
Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
> Daniel Golle wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:28:40PM +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
> >
> >> Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> >>
> >>> I use kmod-ubi for creating a block device from the squasfs using
> >>> module param
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:53:34 +0200
Daniel Golle wrote:
[snip]
> Are you planning to switch to initramfs and then load the ubi and
> ubifs modules in order to get a persistent rootfs?!
> Remember that otherwise, these modules are needed to be built-in to
> the kernel in order to mount
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 07:40:56AM +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
> Daniel Golle wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:28:40PM +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
> > > Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> > > > I use kmod-ubi for creating a block device from the squasfs using module
> > > > parameters as there is no bu
Daniel Golle wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:28:40PM +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
I use kmod-ubi for creating a block device from the squasfs using module
parameters as there is no busybox ubiblock applet yet. If ubi is made
available as module so obvioulsy shou
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:28:40PM +0200, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
> Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> > I use kmod-ubi for creating a block device from the squasfs using module
> > parameters as there is no busybox ubiblock applet yet. If ubi is made
> > available as module so obvioulsy should ubifs.
> >
> >
Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
I use kmod-ubi for creating a block device from the squasfs using module
parameters as there is no busybox ubiblock applet yet. If ubi is made
available as module so obvioulsy should ubifs.
This completes the addition of kmod-fs-squashfs in commit
5163389b9c3b302a0d53df9a
I use kmod-ubi for creating a block device from the squasfs using module
parameters as there is no busybox ubiblock applet yet. If ubi is made
available as module so obvioulsy should ubifs.
This completes the addition of kmod-fs-squashfs in commit
5163389b9c3b302a0d53df9a70294da5cbc08ada
--
V2: k
17 matches
Mail list logo
