+1 for Designated Driver
When I last checked the Doodle around day 2, Designated Driver was
leading with about 2:1, and I couldn't see much spam at that point. I
guess the mailing list archives are public, so robots and pranksters
could do targeted harvesting of such polling links in short order.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Eric Schultz
wrote:
> +1
>
> I agree with Imre that Dirty Diamond should be avoided due to its unpleasant
> connotations with blood diamonds.
>
> Eric
>
> --
> Eric Schultz, Community Manager, prpl Foundation
> http://www.prplfoundation.org
> eschu...@prplfoundatio
+1
I agree with Imre that Dirty Diamond should be avoided due to its
unpleasant connotations with blood diamonds.
Eric
--
Eric Schultz, Community Manager, prpl Foundation
http://www.prplfoundation.org
eschu...@prplfoundation.org
cell: 920-539-0404
skype: ericschultzwi
@EricPrpl
+1
On 2015-04-07 15:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
> change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
> mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
> good old fashioned
Imre Kaloz wrote:
> Designated Driver fits the best as a name, but it's a mocktail (but at
> least tastes good).
+1
And, it would be be nice if all the "drivers" were up-to-date... :-
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.o
+1
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
+1
Sorry I had to spam the whole distlist...
/ted
-Original Message-
From: Hartmut Knaack
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 6:21 AM
To: Ted Hess
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver
Ted Hess schrieb am 08.04.2015 um 23:43:
+1
/ted
Hi,
it seems this mail just got to
+1
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
+1
>
>
> 2015-04-07 21:47 GMT+02:00 Hartmut Knaack :
> That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone
> could even
> change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated
> over this
> mailing list, and subscribers are at least basi
+1
2015-04-07 21:47 GMT+02:00 Hartmut Knaack :
> That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
> change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
> mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not
> have a
> good old fashio
+1
--
Brent
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
> change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
> mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not hav
+1
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Oleg Titov wrote:
> +1
> ___
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
___
openwrt-dev
+1
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
+1
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
+1 for Designated Driver
On 07.04.2015 21:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
> change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
> mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have
+1 Designated Driver
On Apr 8, 2015 3:27 PM, "Ștefan Rusu" wrote:
> +1
> ___
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>
>
__
+1
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
+1
On 07.04.2015 21:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
> change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
> mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
> good old fashioned
> That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
> change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
> mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
> good old fashioned poll?
>
> Give your +1 answer on this mail if
+1 for Designated Driver
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
> change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
> mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, w
+1 for "Designated Driver"
On 15-04-07 12:47 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
+1
Hartmut Knaack hat geschrieben:
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
good old fashioned poll?
Give your
+1
Em ter, 7 de abr de 2015 às 18:15, Daniel Petre
escreveu:
> +1
>
> On 08/04/15 00:09, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On 04/07/2015 08:47 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> >> That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could
> even
> >> change or delete other votes. Since thi
+1
On 08/04/15 00:09, Bruno Randolf wrote:
+1
On 04/07/2015 08:47 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically ve
+1
On 04/07/2015 08:47 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
> change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
> mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
> good old fashion
+1
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 21:47:35 +0200
From: Hartmut Knaack
To: edgar.sol...@web.de,
OpenWrt Development List
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or
+1
- Original Message -
From: "edgar soldin"
To: "OpenWrt Development List"
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2015 4:10:20 PM
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver
hmm.. seems like all doodle polls, incl. the original one suffer from this
weakness. hereby i declare
hmm.. seems like all doodle polls, incl. the original one suffer from this
weakness. hereby i declare defeat and hope you Hartmut will count the votes
properly, manually as seems necessary.
+1 for Designated Driver
..ede
PS: i will deactivate the flawed doodle poll now
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 a
+1
Hartmut Knaack schrieb am 07.04.2015 um 21:47:
> That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
> change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
> mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
> good old fashio
+1
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
> change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
> mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not
> have a
> goo
+1 for Designated Driver
Aaron Z
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion,
butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance
accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders,
give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this
mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a
good old fashioned poll?
Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer "
32 matches
Mail list logo
