On 10/31/19 5:50 AM, Petr Štetiar wrote:
Ben Greear [2019-10-29 06:23:52]:
The original SO_BINDTODEVICE patches were offered upstream
and there is no interest.
It seems like there's finally some interest[1] and you do a good job over there.
Someone asked me to create a different branch, an
Ben Greear [2019-10-29 06:23:52]:
> The original SO_BINDTODEVICE patches were offered upstream
> and there is no interest.
It seems like there's finally some interest[1] and you do a good job over there.
> My recent changes would need rebasing to clean them up before upstreaming,
> and I am not
On 10/28/2019 11:14 PM, Petr Štetiar wrote:
Ben Greear [2019-10-28 14:42:32]:
Hi Ben,
found and fixed a bunch of issues
apart from lack of time, do you've any other good reason to not upstream those
changes? :-)
The original SO_BINDTODEVICE patches were offered upstream
and there is no
Ben Greear [2019-10-28 14:42:32]:
Hi Ben,
> found and fixed a bunch of issues
apart from lack of time, do you've any other good reason to not upstream those
changes? :-)
> and of course possibly added some new bugs.
As always, those could be probably spotted by another pair of eyes during
ups
We added iperf3 support to our network testing tool, so we could more easily
use generic third-party systems as remote traffic endpoints. While doing this,
I ended up getting iperf3 to compile for and run stable on windows, found and
fixed a bunch of
issues, and of course possibly added some new
