Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-09 Thread Eric Schultz
+1 I agree with Imre that Dirty Diamond should be avoided due to its unpleasant connotations with blood diamonds. Eric -- Eric Schultz, Community Manager, prpl Foundation http://www.prplfoundation.org eschu...@prplfoundation.org cell: 920-539-0404 skype: ericschultzwi @EricPrpl

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-09 Thread Joshua Judson Rosen
+1 On 2015-04-07 15:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote: That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a good old fashioned

[OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-09 Thread Michael Richardson
Imre Kaloz ka...@openwrt.org wrote: Designated Driver fits the best as a name, but it's a mocktail (but at least tastes good). +1 And, it would be be nice if all the drivers were up-to-date... :- ___ openwrt-devel mailing list

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-09 Thread bkil
+1 for Designated Driver When I last checked the Doodle around day 2, Designated Driver was leading with about 2:1, and I couldn't see much spam at that point. I guess the mailing list archives are public, so robots and pranksters could do targeted harvesting of such polling links in short order.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-09 Thread Weedy
+1 ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-09 Thread Richard Kunze
+1 ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-09 Thread Mauricio Tavares
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Eric Schultz eschu...@prplfoundation.org wrote: +1 I agree with Imre that Dirty Diamond should be avoided due to its unpleasant connotations with blood diamonds. Eric -- Eric Schultz, Community Manager, prpl Foundation http://www.prplfoundation.org

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-09 Thread Ted Hess
+1 Sorry I had to spam the whole distlist... /ted -Original Message- From: Hartmut Knaack Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 6:21 AM To: Ted Hess Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver Ted Hess schrieb am 08.04.2015 um 23:43: +1 /ted Hi, it seems this mail just got

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-08 Thread Claudio Thomas
+1 On 07.04.2015 21:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote: That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a good old fashioned

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-08 Thread Alpha Sparc
+1 Designated Driver On Apr 8, 2015 3:27 PM, Ștefan Rusu saltwat...@gmail.com wrote: +1 ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-08 Thread Ștefan Rusu
+1 ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-08 Thread Brent Thomson
+1 -- Brent On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Hartmut Knaack knaac...@gmx.de wrote: That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-08 Thread Joris de Vries
+1 ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-08 Thread Oleg Titov
+1 ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-08 Thread David Hutchison
+1 On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Oleg Titov oleg.ti...@gmail.com wrote: +1 ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-08 Thread Dirk Neukirchen
+1 for Designated Driver On 07.04.2015 21:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote: That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-08 Thread RISCi_ATOM
+1 2015-04-07 21:47 GMT+02:00 Hartmut Knaack knaac...@gmx.de: That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this mailing list, and subscribers are at

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-08 Thread Etienne Champetier
+1 2015-04-07 21:47 GMT+02:00 Hartmut Knaack knaac...@gmx.de: That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a good

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-07 Thread camden lindsay
+1 On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Hartmut Knaack knaac...@gmx.de wrote: That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-07 Thread Hartmut Knaack
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a good old fashioned poll? Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-07 Thread Aaron Z
+1 for Designated Driver Aaron Z A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations,

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-07 Thread edgar . soldin
hmm.. seems like all doodle polls, incl. the original one suffer from this weakness. hereby i declare defeat and hope you Hartmut will count the votes properly, manually as seems necessary. +1 for Designated Driver ..ede PS: i will deactivate the flawed doodle poll now On Tue, Apr 7, 2015

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-07 Thread Joseph Marlin
+1 - Original Message - From: edgar soldin edgar.sol...@web.de To: OpenWrt Development List openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2015 4:10:20 PM Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver hmm.. seems like all doodle polls, incl. the original one suffer from

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-07 Thread David Lang
+1 On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, Hartmut Knaack wrote: Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 21:47:35 +0200 From: Hartmut Knaack knaac...@gmx.de To: edgar.sol...@web.de, OpenWrt Development List openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-07 Thread Hartmut Knaack
+1 Hartmut Knaack schrieb am 07.04.2015 um 21:47: That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a good old fashioned

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-07 Thread thomas.langer
+1 Hartmut Knaack knaac...@gmx.de hat geschrieben: That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a good old fashioned

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-07 Thread Bruno Randolf
+1 On 04/07/2015 08:47 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote: That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a good old fashioned

[OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-07 Thread Daniel Petre
+1 On 08/04/15 00:09, Bruno Randolf wrote: +1 On 04/07/2015 08:47 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote: That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-07 Thread Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
+1 Em ter, 7 de abr de 2015 às 18:15, Daniel Petre daniel.pe...@gmail.com escreveu: +1 On 08/04/15 00:09, Bruno Randolf wrote: +1 On 04/07/2015 08:47 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote: That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even change or delete other votes.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-07 Thread Andy Botting
+1 for Designated Driver On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Hartmut Knaack knaac...@gmx.de wrote: That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this mailing list, and subscribers are at least

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-07 Thread Owen Kirby
+1 for Designated Driver On 15-04-07 12:47 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote: That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

2015-04-07 Thread Dmitri Bogomolov
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even change or delete other votes. Since this was just communicated over this mailing list, and subscribers are at least basically verified, why not have a good old fashioned poll? Give your +1 answer on this mail if you