On 2/15/11 1:20 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2011-02-15 10:11 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On 2/15/11 12:18 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2011-02-15 8:09 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On 2/15/11 2:13 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Peter Wagnerwrites:
- [ -n "$leasefile" ]&&[ -e "$leas
On 2011-02-15 10:11 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> On 2/15/11 12:18 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2011-02-15 8:09 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>> On 2/15/11 2:13 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Peter Wagner writes:
> - [ -n "$leasefile" ]&& [ -e "$leasefile" ] || touch "$leasef
On 2/15/11 12:18 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2011-02-15 8:09 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On 2/15/11 2:13 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Peter Wagner writes:
- [ -n "$leasefile" ]&& [ -e "$leasefile" ] || touch "$leasefile"
+ [ -n "$leasefile" ]&& ( [ -e "$leasefile" ] || touch "
On 2011-02-15 8:09 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> On 2/15/11 2:13 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>> Peter Wagner writes:
>>
>>> - [ -n "$leasefile" ]&& [ -e "$leasefile" ] || touch "$leasefile"
>>> + [ -n "$leasefile" ]&& ( [ -e "$leasefile" ] || touch "$leasefile" )
>> Looks like this is
Another version of the patch was allready commited - look here
https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/25540
Am Dienstag, 15. Februar 2011, 20:09:44 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
> On 2/15/11 2:13 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> > Peter Wagner writes:
> >> - [ -n "$leasefile" ]&& [ -e "$leasefile" ] |
On 2/15/11 2:13 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Peter Wagner writes:
- [ -n "$leasefile" ]&& [ -e "$leasefile" ] || touch "$leasefile"
+ [ -n "$leasefile" ]&& ( [ -e "$leasefile" ] || touch "$leasefile" )
Looks like this is fixed already by commit 15fba44a (but see point 6 of
http://my
i see to reflect the date change the file is copied to jffs.. makes sense, so
the touch alone is more expensive due to the nature of the overlaying fs :) ..
thanks ede
On 15.02.2011 12:50, Peter Wagner wrote:
> no its not about what is more expensive but someone in the development
> channel
>
no its not about what is more expensive but someone in the development channel
ment, that a touch on a squashfs with jffs overlay will create a new file on
the jffs overlay even when the file existed on the squashfs partition...
Am Dienstag, 15. Februar 2011, 11:20:47 schrieb edgar.sol...@web.de
On 15.02.2011 11:13, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Peter Wagner writes:
>
>> - [ -n "$leasefile" ] && [ -e "$leasefile" ] || touch "$leasefile"
>> + [ -n "$leasefile" ] && ( [ -e "$leasefile" ] || touch "$leasefile" )
>
> Looks like this is fixed already by commit 15fba44a (but see point 6
Peter Wagner writes:
> - [ -n "$leasefile" ] && [ -e "$leasefile" ] || touch "$leasefile"
> + [ -n "$leasefile" ] && ( [ -e "$leasefile" ] || touch "$leasefile" )
Looks like this is fixed already by commit 15fba44a (but see point 6 of
http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashPitfalls and the r
updated patch - increase PKG_RELEASE too
Am Montag, 14. Februar 2011, 20:14:58 schrieben Sie:
> hi
>
> when i start dnsmasq i get this error
>
> /etc/init.d/dnsmasq start
> touch: : No such file or directory
>
> because i didnt define leasefile in the config file ...
>
> this shouldnt happen a
hi
when i start dnsmasq i get this error
/etc/init.d/dnsmasq start
touch: : No such file or directory
because i didnt define leasefile in the config file ...
this shouldnt happen as the statement is
[ -n "$leasefile" ] && [ -e "$leasefile" ] || touch "$leasefile"
if $leasefile="" it will exe
12 matches
Mail list logo
