Am Montag, 6. Mai 2011, 07:09:43 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
> On 6/5/11 11:10 AM, Peter Wagner wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 5. Mai 2011, 20:02:13 schrieb Peter Wagner:
> >> Am Sonntag, 5. Mai 2011, 19:54:22 schrieb Peter Wagner:
> >>> Am Freitag, 3. Mai 2011, 04:11:43 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
>
В Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:08:01 -0700
Philip Prindeville пишет:
> On 6/5/11 10:54 AM, Peter Wagner wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 3. Mai 2011, 04:11:43 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
> >> On 5/31/11 10:48 AM, Peter Wagner wrote:
> >>> Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2011, 17:52:58 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
> On 5/3
On 6/5/11 11:10 AM, Peter Wagner wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 5. Mai 2011, 20:02:13 schrieb Peter Wagner:
>> Am Sonntag, 5. Mai 2011, 19:54:22 schrieb Peter Wagner:
>>> Am Freitag, 3. Mai 2011, 04:11:43 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
On 5/31/11 10:48 AM, Peter Wagner wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 201
On 6/5/11 10:54 AM, Peter Wagner wrote:
> Am Freitag, 3. Mai 2011, 04:11:43 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
>> On 5/31/11 10:48 AM, Peter Wagner wrote:
>>> Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2011, 17:52:58 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
On 5/30/11 4:00 PM, Peter Wagner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while i was read
Am Sonntag, 5. Mai 2011, 20:02:13 schrieb Peter Wagner:
> Am Sonntag, 5. Mai 2011, 19:54:22 schrieb Peter Wagner:
> > Am Freitag, 3. Mai 2011, 04:11:43 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
> > > On 5/31/11 10:48 AM, Peter Wagner wrote:
> > > > Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2011, 17:52:58 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
Am Sonntag, 5. Mai 2011, 19:54:22 schrieb Peter Wagner:
> Am Freitag, 3. Mai 2011, 04:11:43 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
> > On 5/31/11 10:48 AM, Peter Wagner wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2011, 17:52:58 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
> > >> On 5/30/11 4:00 PM, Peter Wagner wrote:
> > >>> Hi,
> > >
Am Freitag, 3. Mai 2011, 04:11:43 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
> On 5/31/11 10:48 AM, Peter Wagner wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2011, 17:52:58 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
> >> On 5/30/11 4:00 PM, Peter Wagner wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> while i was reading some init files i stumbled upon this:
On 5/31/11 10:48 AM, Peter Wagner wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2011, 17:52:58 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
>> On 5/30/11 4:00 PM, Peter Wagner wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> while i was reading some init files i stumbled upon this:
>>>
>>> /sbin/wifi detect >> /etc/config/wireless
>>>
>>> grep -qs config /
Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2011, 17:52:58 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
> On 5/30/11 4:00 PM, Peter Wagner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > while i was reading some init files i stumbled upon this:
> >
> > /sbin/wifi detect >> /etc/config/wireless
> >
> > grep -qs config /etc/config/wireless && {
> >
> > /sb
On 5/30/11 4:00 PM, Peter Wagner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while i was reading some init files i stumbled upon this:
>
> /sbin/wifi detect >> /etc/config/wireless
>
> grep -qs config /etc/config/wireless && {
> /sbin/wifi up
> } || {
> rm -f /etc/config/wireless
> }
>
> this means:
>
>> /sb
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 10:14 -0300, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > This is assuming the theoretical story is correct in practice. In
> > practice, I've seen flashes (especially NAND, but also NOR) die a
> lot
> > sooner then that especially in cheap consumer hardware :(
>
> But these cases aren't av
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Stefan Monnier
wrote:
>> This is assuming the theoretical story is correct in practice. In
>> practice, I've seen flashes (especially NAND, but also NOR) die a lot
>> sooner then that especially in cheap consumer hardware :(
>
> But these cases aren't avoided b
> This is assuming the theoretical story is correct in practice. In
> practice, I've seen flashes (especially NAND, but also NOR) die a lot
> sooner then that especially in cheap consumer hardware :(
But these cases aren't avoided by writing less.
Stefan
Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2011, 13:29:59 schrieb Ithamar R. Adema:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 11:44 +0300, Vasilis Tsiligiannis wrote:
> > They typically last more than 100,000 program/erase cycles so I don't
> > think you will have a problem in the first 150 years of use.
>
> This is assuming th
Hi,
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 11:44 +0300, Vasilis Tsiligiannis wrote:
> They typically last more than 100,000 program/erase cycles so I don't
> think you will have a problem in the first 150 years of use.
This is assuming the theoretical story is correct in practice. In
practice, I've seen flashes (
Hi,
thumbs up for catching this. In my opinion it doesn't matter how often
the device is booted, because its possible that this is not the only
occurence where writing to the flash was not necessary. So the less
write access we have, the better it is.
As a suggestion, 'help test' shows that an no
Στις Τρι 31 Μαΐ 2011 11:03:10 Alexander Gordeev γράψατε:
> Once or twice per day is enough?
> I have a small router with a battery and USB port which you can plug
> any USB 3g/4g modem in. It's quite handy to bring it with you and turn
> on/off only when you need it.
They typically last more than
В Mon, 30 May 2011 18:38:00 -0700
Philip Prindeville пишет:
> How often are you booting that this is even a concern?
Once or twice per day is enough?
I have a small router with a battery and USB port which you can plug
any USB 3g/4g modem in. It's quite handy to bring it with you and turn
on/off
How often are you booting that this is even a concern?
On 5/30/11 4:00 PM, Peter Wagner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while i was reading some init files i stumbled upon this:
>
> /sbin/wifi detect >> /etc/config/wireless
>
> grep -qs config /etc/config/wireless && {
> /sbin/wifi up
> } || {
>
Hi,
while i was reading some init files i stumbled upon this:
/sbin/wifi detect >> /etc/config/wireless
grep -qs config /etc/config/wireless && {
/sbin/wifi up
} || {
rm -f /etc/config/wireless
}
this means:
> /sbin/wifi detect >> /etc/config/wireless
/sbin/wifi only outputs s
20 matches
Mail list logo
