>With 2.6.37 and later, there will be no more mini_fo bugs - mini_fo has >been replaced with overlayfs there, which seems to be *much* more stable >than mini_fo ever was. > >- Felix
Hi Felix, I missed your original post. I'm on too many lists (18k emails in my inbox ;) ). So you have seen good things with overlayfs so far? I was just about to patch a 2.6.37 kernel with mini_fo and saw the overlayfs patch set. Is it safe to patch a kernel with both and turn on which ever one you want to use? I glanced and didn't think I saw any conflicting files. I've used mini_fo for years so I'm not quite up to speed on overlayfs yet. I'm all for switching since the original mini_fo at Wolfgang's site has not been updated in years. Regards, Brian _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
