Hi all,
I am (slowly) experimenting with my LaCie Ethernet Disk Mini v2 NAS.
In order to maintain compatibility with Lacie's software, I did not change
the disk layout (yet).
I can run my own OpenWRT without disrupting the original firmware
by putting the kernel's uImage on [sda9]/snaps/00/boot an
Is there a sync command before the unmount?
Maybe the system does not reach the umount call, and therefor it is
never cleanly unmounted? You could debug that.
Maybe the controller is caching and needs specific commands to write the
cache to disc? Did you search the web?
good luck, ede
On 30.01
Hi
for me openwrt also doesnt umount the disk ... okay i mount them by hand (in an
init script) and i dont add them to fstab but i found a
simple but effective solution...
maybe im wrong but for me it seems a poweroff/reboot doesnt bring any service
down
,as it is done on my desktop box, it j
Ciao Gerlando,
can you try to modify the mount init script adding a "ps" just before
the umount -a -r call?
I think that you have some process that are locking some file.
best regards,
luigi
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 4:46 PM, puchu wrote:
> Hi
>
> for me openwrt also doesnt umount the disk ... o
s/are locking/is locking/g
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Luigi Mantellini
wrote:
> Ciao Gerlando,
>
> can you try to modify the mount init script adding a "ps" just before
> the umount -a -r call?
> I think that you have some process that are locking some file.
>
> best regards,
>
> luigi
>
>
hi,
there are some packages that need to be stopped ... just talked to ndb ... the
last mail i sent just fixes this ...
so it should work in future ... but if u have other progs that keep a lock on a
mounted fs ... feel free to send it to the mailinglist /open
a ticket :)
greets
Am Samstag 30 J
Well, when manually "umouning -r" there were processes holding a lock,
particularly syslogd or so it seems.
However, I logged to console the output of the shutdown scripts - the
error message for not being able to umount /dev/root is not there
anymore. So apparently the shutdown script correctly ki
> I tried switching to ext2, but now I can't even boot at all:
>
> VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) on device 8:2.
> Freeing init memory: 116K
> Please be patient, while OpenWrt loads ...
>
> Maybe I screwed up something in my backup / mkfs / restore process...
> tomorrow I'll try with a fresh o
Hi,
i use xfs but on my linux desktop system (not openwrt) ... there it works nice.
the only thing i know is that xfs needs more ram then ext2/3 and on systems
with low ram profile it
can get very unreliable and unstable.
greets
Am Sonntag 31 Januar 2010 14:11:12 schrieb Gerlando Falauto:
> > I
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 2:29 PM, puchu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i use xfs but on my linux desktop system (not openwrt) ... there it works
> nice.
> the only thing i know is that xfs needs more ram then ext2/3 and on systems
> with low ram profile it
> can get very unreliable and unstable.
Well it's 64M
Ciao Gerlando,
In general xfs and ext4 performances are very similar. If you really
need a true transactional fs I suggest you to switch to ext4 that
requires lesser resources than xfs.
ciao
luigi
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 2:29 PM, puchu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i use xfs but on my linux desktop system
Hi Gerlando,
Gerlando Falauto a écrit :
> I overwrote my ext2 root fs with the fresh root filesystem.
> Now everything works perfectly.
> Does anybody, ever, use XFS at all?
> It looks so buggy to me...
Don't use XFS !
Different versions of the XFS driver are not compatibles.
It seems that the v
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> Don't use XFS !
I WON'Tt. I promise. Definitely NOT for root filesystem.
> Different versions of the XFS driver are not compatibles.
> It seems that the version you have in your kernel is different from the
> version used by LaCie. So w
13 matches
Mail list logo
