The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
Op 18 feb. 2021, om 18:48 heeft
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/3890 Voila -- here's a
potentially much, much nicer approach in the long term.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
utzler
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireguard-tools: Add dependency on kmod-wireguard
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 11:11 AM Hannu Nyman
> wrote:
> > There the solution was an additional virtual kernel package, which
> > could then handle the kernel mainline / oot d
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:48 AM Rosen Penev wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 8:31 PM Ilya Lipnitskiy
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 5:57 PM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > >
> > > I've backported WireGuard patch-by patch to 5.4, in a series that you
> > > can simply apply to
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 8:31 PM Ilya Lipnitskiy
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 5:57 PM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> >
> > I've backported WireGuard patch-by patch to 5.4, in a series that you
> > can simply apply to your existing 5.4 kernels. I can prepare that for
> > you guys
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 5:57 PM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>
> I've backported WireGuard patch-by patch to 5.4, in a series that you
> can simply apply to your existing 5.4 kernels. I can prepare that for
> you guys tomorrow. That way, you'll have the kernel module in both 5.4
> and 5.10
I've backported WireGuard patch-by patch to 5.4, in a series that you
can simply apply to your existing 5.4 kernels. I can prepare that for
you guys tomorrow. That way, you'll have the kernel module in both 5.4
and 5.10 through the same mechanisms with the same code. That might
save a lot of the
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 11:11 AM Hannu Nyman wrote:
> There the solution was an additional virtual kernel package, which could then
> handle the kernel mainline / oot dependency difference inside the target.
> https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/3039
Thanks for all the great feedback.
Ilya Lipnitskiy kirjoitti 18.2.2021 klo 19.48:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 9:21 AM Adrian Schmutzler
wrote:
I don't really get the point of this justification. Either wireguard-tools depends on
kmod-wireguard, or it doesn't. In the first case, and only then, it should be
"fixed" (with a
Adrian,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 10:38 AM Adrian Schmutzler
wrote:
> > Are wireguard-tools useful without the underlying kernel module? It didn't
> > seem like it to me, although maybe Jason should chime in here, as maintainer
> > and developer of Wireguard.
>
> Then why didn't you use that as
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireguard-tools: Add dependency on kmod-wireguard
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 9:21 AM Adrian Schmutzler
> wrote:
> > I don't really get the point of this justification. Either wireguard-tools
> depends on kmod-wireguard, or it doesn't. In the
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 9:21 AM Adrian Schmutzler
wrote:
> I don't really get the point of this justification. Either wireguard-tools
> depends on kmod-wireguard, or it doesn't. In the first case, and only then,
> it should be "fixed" (with a proper justification describing that).
Are
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Ilya Lipnitskiy
> Sent: Mittwoch, 17. Februar 2021 21:25
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Cc: Jason A . Donenfeld ; Ilya Lipnitskiy
>
> Subject:
Hi Andrey,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 3:32 AM Andrey Jr. Melnikov
wrote:
> This is broken when compiled package ip-full
iproute2 does not depend on kmod-wireguard, so I can't see how it can
be related to my change.
Ilya
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
Ilya Lipnitskiy wrote:
> Prepares for wireguard migration to Linux 5.10. The plan is to make luci
> packages depend only on wireguard-tools, then to change the existing
> kmod-wireguard to kmod-wireguard-oot and add the in-tree module for
> 5.10. But for those changes to be made, wireguard-tools
Prepares for wireguard migration to Linux 5.10. The plan is to make luci
packages depend only on wireguard-tools, then to change the existing
kmod-wireguard to kmod-wireguard-oot and add the in-tree module for
5.10. But for those changes to be made, wireguard-tools needs to depend
on
16 matches
Mail list logo
