Re: Future of the broadcom-wl package?

2024-01-29 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On 26.01.2024 18:45, Felix Fietkau wrote: does anybody still care about the broadcom-wl package in OpenWrt? I think it would be nice if we could get rid of it, along with the code support and abstraction for different wireless drivers. It would also allow us to rewrite iwinfo in ucode with

Re: Future of the broadcom-wl package?

2024-01-27 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 1/26/24 18:45, Felix Fietkau wrote: Hi, does anybody still care about the broadcom-wl package in OpenWrt? I think it would be nice if we could get rid of it, along with the code support and abstraction for different wireless drivers. It would also allow us to rewrite iwinfo in ucode with

Re: Future of the broadcom-wl package?

2024-01-26 Thread Christian Marangi
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 06:45:58PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote: > Hi, > > does anybody still care about the broadcom-wl package in OpenWrt? > I think it would be nice if we could get rid of it, along with the code > support and abstraction for different wireless drivers. > It would also allow us

Re: Future of the broadcom-wl package?

2024-01-26 Thread David Bauer
Hi Felix, On 1/26/24 18:45, Felix Fietkau wrote: Hi, does anybody still care about the broadcom-wl package in OpenWrt? I think it would be nice if we could get rid of it, along with the code support and abstraction for different wireless drivers. It would also allow us to rewrite iwinfo in

Future of the broadcom-wl package?

2024-01-26 Thread Felix Fietkau
Hi, does anybody still care about the broadcom-wl package in OpenWrt? I think it would be nice if we could get rid of it, along with the code support and abstraction for different wireless drivers. It would also allow us to rewrite iwinfo in ucode with nl80211 as the only supported API, which