Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes:
> Could I kindly ask you to read
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/521344/ particularly with regards to
> Yousong's comments. You'll hopefully appreciate the irony of your
> suggestion and how things (by which I mean 'I') have been sent on a bit
> of a merry-go
On 01/10/15 16:20, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes:
>
>> This patch stops SIGHUP from enabling dnssec timechecks if disabled by
>> use of --dnssec-no-timecheck option. --dnssec-timestamp continues to
>> work correctly.
> I'd argue that patching dnsmasq in this way
Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes:
> This patch stops SIGHUP from enabling dnssec timechecks if disabled by
> use of --dnssec-no-timecheck option. --dnssec-timestamp continues to
> work correctly.
I'd argue that patching dnsmasq in this way is the wrong way to fix
this. If you're worried about tha
On 01/10/15 12:56, Etienne Champetier wrote:
>
>
> 2015-10-01 13:21 GMT+02:00 Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> mailto:ke...@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>>:
>
>
>
> On 01/10/15 11:37, Etienne Champetier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2015-10-01 12:19 GMT+02:00 Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> >
2015-10-01 13:21 GMT+02:00 Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <
ke...@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>:
>
>
> On 01/10/15 11:37, Etienne Champetier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2015-10-01 12:19 GMT+02:00 Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> > mailto:ke...@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>>:
> >
> > This patch stops SIGHUP from enabling d
On 01/10/15 11:37, Etienne Champetier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2015-10-01 12:19 GMT+02:00 Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> mailto:ke...@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>>:
>
> This patch stops SIGHUP from enabling dnssec timechecks if disabled by
> use of --dnssec-no-timecheck option. --dnssec-timestamp continu
Hi,
2015-10-01 12:19 GMT+02:00 Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <
ke...@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>:
> This patch stops SIGHUP from enabling dnssec timechecks if disabled by
> use of --dnssec-no-timecheck option. --dnssec-timestamp continues to
> work correctly.
>
I haven't really followed the previous dis