Re: ath10k-ct all hash values are different?

2021-01-15 Thread David Bauer
Hi Ben, On 1/14/21 7:14 PM, Ben Greear wrote: On 1/14/21 10:05 AM, Ben Greear wrote: On 1/13/21 4:58 PM, Sven Roederer wrote: Ben, seems to me, that at least "firmware-5-ct-full-community-12.bin-lede.013" is still not recovered. File is there, but contains only 0x00. This seems to cause my

Re: ath10k-ct all hash values are different?

2021-01-14 Thread Ben Greear
On 1/14/21 10:05 AM, Ben Greear wrote: On 1/13/21 4:58 PM, Sven Roederer wrote: Ben, seems to me, that at least "firmware-5-ct-full-community-12.bin-lede.013" is still not recovered. File is there, but contains only 0x00. This seems to cause my fresh build of 19.07.5 to fail. Yes, I verified

Re: ath10k-ct all hash values are different?

2021-01-14 Thread Ben Greear
On 1/13/21 4:58 PM, Sven Roederer wrote: Ben, seems to me, that at least "firmware-5-ct-full-community-12.bin-lede.013" is still not recovered. File is there, but contains only 0x00. This seems to cause my fresh build of 19.07.5 to fail. Yes, I verified that 9980 firmware is not recovered.

Re: ath10k-ct all hash values are different?

2021-01-13 Thread Sven Roederer
Ben, seems to me, that at least "firmware-5-ct-full-community-12.bin-lede.013" is still not recovered. File is there, but contains only 0x00. This seems to cause my fresh build of 19.07.5 to fail. + curl -f --connect-timeout 20 --retry 5 --location --insecure https://

Re: ath10k-ct all hash values are different?

2020-11-09 Thread Ben Greear
I think I fixed it all on our web page, let me know if otherwise. Thanks, Ben On 11/9/20 1:42 AM, Nick wrote: Can we somehow get to the same naming convention, again? In OpenWrt it is: QCA998X-firmware-... directly in /. On the ct server it is QCA998X/firmware-...? Bests, Nick On 11/8/20

Re: ath10k-ct all hash values are different?

2020-11-09 Thread Nick
Can we somehow get to the same naming convention, again? In OpenWrt it is: QCA998X-firmware-... directly in /. On the ct server it is QCA998X/firmware-...? Bests, Nick On 11/8/20 10:55 PM, Ben Greear wrote: > I tried to copy them all back into place...could have made mistakes since > owrt names

Re: ath10k-ct all hash values are different?

2020-11-08 Thread Nick
I will test the new firmware files. :) A quick workaround is to use the openwrt mirror: diff --git a/package/firmware/ath10k-ct-firmware/Makefile b/package/firmware/ath10k-ct-firmware/Makefile index c298f80186..fcc49543dd 100644 --- a/package/firmware/ath10k-ct-firmware/Makefile +++

Re: ath10k-ct all hash values are different?

2020-11-08 Thread Ben Greear
I tried to copy them all back into place...could have made mistakes since owrt names them differently than what is on my web server. Please try some older builds for various firmware and let me know if there are still issues. Thanks, Ben On 11/8/20 9:49 AM, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: Hi, All

Re: ath10k-ct all hash values are different?

2020-11-08 Thread Baptiste Jonglez
Hi, All versions of the firmware are mirrored here http://sources.openwrt.org/ It's just that the build system somehow fails to fallback to this mirror like it does for regular downloads (in other words: it's a bug) Ben, could you re-upload all versions so that older builds can still work?

Re: ath10k-ct all hash values are different?

2020-11-08 Thread Ben Greear
I have uploaded latest, please see if this works. greearb@ww2 downloads]$ ~/bin/fw_lede.bash 988x H988XFC=398e4380e7e55105f3da0f78af29d1e437404ed3a82597aa4b6daaa7dce1a38e firmware-2-ct-full-community-22.bin.lede.022 H988XFCH=990d9cbf79dd81f141257a289f89808bd7726406c9ed845a7e49e5167002ffde

Re: ath10k-ct all hash values are different?

2020-11-07 Thread Nick
It is the firmware that is broken and just contains 0s. On 11/7/20 6:54 PM, Nick wrote: > I fixed the hash values: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/3573 > Not sure why the hash is suddenly different for all firmware files? > > ___ > openwrt-devel

ath10k-ct all hash values are different?

2020-11-07 Thread Nick
I fixed the hash values: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/3573 Not sure why the hash is suddenly different for all firmware files? ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org