On 21 Jul 2015, at 09:15, Jonathan Schleifer
wrote:
> Am 21.07.2015 um 09:44 schrieb David Banes :
>
>> If you're serious about stopping someone with greater computational power
>> than you getting at your data then you should take every bit you can. But I
>> agree, most people won't bother b
On 21 July 2015 at 08:44, David Banes wrote:
> On 20 Jul 2015, at 23:19, Jonathan Schleifer <
> js-xmpp-operat...@webkeks.org> wrote:
>
> > Am 21.07.2015 um 00:10 schrieb David Banes :
> >
> >> On 20 Jul 2015, at 23:07, Peter Kieser wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 2015-07-10 2:47 AM, Mathias Ertl wrote:
>
Am 21.07.2015 um 09:44 schrieb David Banes :
> If you're serious about stopping someone with greater computational power
> than you getting at your data then you should take every bit you can. But I
> agree, most people won't bother because you'd need the computing power
> available to NIST to
On 20 Jul 2015, at 23:19, Jonathan Schleifer
wrote:
> Am 21.07.2015 um 00:10 schrieb David Banes :
>
>> On 20 Jul 2015, at 23:07, Peter Kieser wrote:
>>
>>> On 2015-07-10 2:47 AM, Mathias Ertl wrote:
* Have a valid 4096 bit certificate with at least a sha256 signature.
>>>
>>> 4096 bit
