Re: [Operators] Obtaining XMPP-enabled certificate for server

2016-07-19 Thread Dave Cridland
On 19 July 2016 at 17:36, Marvin Gülker wrote: > Am Tue, 19 Jul 2016 16:15:40 +0200 > schrieb Florian Schmaus : > > Isn't one problem that a cert with CN "example.org" will be valid for > > all services found on example.org (simply speaking), whereas when > > using SRV-ID restricts the cert to a

Re: [Operators] Obtaining XMPP-enabled certificate for server

2016-07-19 Thread Solomon Peachy
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 06:36:01PM +0200, Marvin G??lker wrote: > I have always wondered about which domains should actually be included > into a TLS certificate for use in XMPP services once an SRV record is > in place. Do I need a certificate which covers xmpp.example.com? Or > does one for examp

Re: [Operators] Obtaining XMPP-enabled certificate for server

2016-07-19 Thread Marvin Gülker
Am Tue, 19 Jul 2016 16:15:40 +0200 schrieb Florian Schmaus : > Isn't one problem that a cert with CN "example.org" will be valid for > all services found on example.org (simply speaking), whereas when > using SRV-ID restricts the cert to a particular service? I have always wondered about which dom

Re: [Operators] Obtaining XMPP-enabled certificate for server

2016-07-19 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 19.07.2016 16:06, Sam Whited wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 4:53 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> I wonder if people really care about this usage any more -- it does not >> scale well (all domains have to be encoded in the same cert => big >> certs) and introduces an indirection which often leav

Re: [Operators] Obtaining XMPP-enabled certificate for server

2016-07-19 Thread Thomas Camaran
I think the very question is: it's possible to use srv and let's encrypted certificate? and if yes how with prosody? 2016-07-19 16:06 GMT+02:00 Sam Whited : > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 4:53 AM, Simon Josefsson > wrote: > > I wonder if people really care about this usage any more -- it does not > >

Re: [Operators] Obtaining XMPP-enabled certificate for server

2016-07-19 Thread Sam Whited
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 4:53 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote: > I wonder if people really care about this usage any more -- it does not > scale well (all domains have to be encoded in the same cert => big > certs) and introduces an indirection which often leaves room for > attackers I don't understand

Re: [Operators] Obtaining XMPP-enabled certificate for server

2016-07-19 Thread Simon Josefsson
Martin Vietz writes: > Hi Tomasz, > > On 10.07.2016 23:30, Tomasz Sterna wrote: >> I am already using letsencrypt for https, but I wasn't sure it would >> work with XMPP. > > You can also secure all other services using ssl/tls with x509, e.g. > SMTP, IMAP, FTP over SSL, Mumble Let's Encrypt doe