Signs suggest I'm still unable to add gmail users to my contact list...
Is Google still broken?
Luke
On Thursday, May 23, 2013 10:50:19 PM Justin Uberti wrote:
> I just realized my statement could be parsed 2 different ways. To be clear:
> it is sad that spammers were more willing to adopt XMPP* than other IM
> networks were willing to*. Believe me, we tried.
Other IM networks continue to use XMP
On Thursday, March 07, 2013 4:37:14 PM Thomas wrote:
> there is a gTalk tech in this list that can help me with a problem with
> google?
FWIW, I can confirm gmail.com at least is malfunctioning in terms of adding
people to my roster... they never get my request and cannot confirm it.
Luke
On Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:45:55 AM Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> A program that enables you to cheat at DarkOrbit ("The ultimate Browser
> Game space adventure") has established itself on the XMPP network. In
> essence, you pay for a license and then you are able to "chat" over IM
> to obtain rea
On Saturday 12 June 2010 01:23:22 am Bartosz Szulc wrote:
> * domain: tr0lit.name
Is this serious? Does anyone else think it looks like "troll it"...?
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 05:42:27 pm Adam Kalsey wrote:
> We're getting timeouts when trying to establish an s2s connection to
> Google. Looking through their srv records, I see...
>
> _xmpp-server._tcp.gmail.com. 86400 IN SRV 20 0 5269
> xmpp-server1.l.google.com.
> _xmpp-server._tcp.gmai
On Friday 24 April 2009 12:41:54 am Mickaël Rémond wrote:
> It depends on your usage but normally it should not break easily. We
> have many examples of uptime more than 6 months. Some servers have
> been running for more than One year.
Most common breakage has been when I upgrade Erlang.
That alm
On Thursday 23 April 2009 11:39:10 pm Nickola Kolev wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:03:40 -0500
>
> "Luke-Jr" wrote:
> > On Thursday 23 April 2009 06:04:52 pm Will Tatam wrote:
> > > Out of interest I see almost everyone seems to be running ejabberd
> >
On Thursday 23 April 2009 06:04:52 pm Will Tatam wrote:
> Out of interest I see almost everyone seems to be running ejabberd these
> days, this because they have had issues with jabberd14 or jabberd2 or
> just gone for ejabberd due to it's scaling options, should that be
> required ?
My own perso
On Wednesday 20 February 2008, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> And remember, you attract more flies with honey than with vinegar...
http://xkcd.com/357/
On Friday 12 September 2008 11:34:33 Sean Dilda wrote:
> Luke -Jr wrote:
> > Am I the only one having federation issues with gmail.com?
>
> Our federation with gmail.com seems to be working fine.
This is all I get matching /gmail/ in my ejabberd log...
I(<0.420.0>:ejabberd_s
Am I the only one having federation issues with gmail.com?
On Monday 11 August 2008, Florian Jensen wrote:
> Has anyone seen similar? Any idea what the source of it is? Another hack
> attack (spam bots)?
Looks like automated registration. Is it disabled on your server? If not, I
don't think you could call this hacking/cracking...
13 matches
Mail list logo
