Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
> Fri, 22 Aug 2014 23:33:43 +0200
> Skhaen wrote:
>
>> Ohai everybody!
>>
>> We need an upgrade for xmpp.net: if a server is running with SSLv3 or
>> without PFS, the score *must* be downgraded to B.
>>
>> As you know, most of the people will not upgrade if they have A-.
.
.
.
.
.
s2s and c2s tests reporting ok now
the new badges are a nice addition
whatever changed in your report is working for ec certs
interestingly, this is the only server ever reported to have an ec cert
at xmpp.net
i also wonder if mqas.net is the only photographer in the world to have
a
additionally using this server to chat to many others was tested and
working
is it because of the cert that the s2s test fails completely ?
shm...@riseup.net wrote:
> hi Thijs,
>
> Thijs Alkemade wrote:
>>
>> On 26 jul. 2014, at 05:18, shm...@riseup.net wrote:
>
>&g
hi Thijs,
Thijs Alkemade wrote:
>
> On 26 jul. 2014, at 05:18, shm...@riseup.net wrote:
>> i dont know what's up with the s2s though
>>
>>
>
> It’s still unimplemented because I didn’t have any server to test against
> when I set it up.
i tried mqas.ne
?
shm...@riseup.net wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> i was testing an xmpp server and i believe its wrong to reduce the
> score because of the cert which is reported < 1024 bits
>
> i think the testing backend only assumes an RSA cert, is that right ?
>
> the server i tested
hi,
i was testing an xmpp server and i believe its wrong to reduce the
score because of the cert which is reported < 1024 bits
i think the testing backend only assumes an RSA cert, is that right ?
the server i tested is using a cert in a pure ECC chain with ECDSA 384
and not a standard RSA cert