On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 06:06:21PM +1000, shm...@riseup.net wrote:
> i also wonder if mqas.net is the only photographer in the world to have
> a dnssec signed zone...not sure how to research that one though
Not the only one. :)
- Solomon
--
Solomon Peachy pizza at shaft
On 18 aug. 2014, at 10:06, shm...@riseup.net wrote:
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
>
> s2s and c2s tests reporting ok now
>
> the new badges are a nice addition
>
> whatever changed in your report is working for ec certs
>
> interestingly, this is the only server ever reported to have an ec cert
> at xm
.
.
.
.
.
s2s and c2s tests reporting ok now
the new badges are a nice addition
whatever changed in your report is working for ec certs
interestingly, this is the only server ever reported to have an ec cert
at xmpp.net
i also wonder if mqas.net is the only photographer in the world to have
a
additionally using this server to chat to many others was tested and
working
is it because of the cert that the s2s test fails completely ?
shm...@riseup.net wrote:
> hi Thijs,
>
> Thijs Alkemade wrote:
>>
>> On 26 jul. 2014, at 05:18, shm...@riseup.net wrote:
>
>>> i dont know what's up with t
hi Thijs,
Thijs Alkemade wrote:
>
> On 26 jul. 2014, at 05:18, shm...@riseup.net wrote:
>> i dont know what's up with the s2s though
>>
>>
>
> It’s still unimplemented because I didn’t have any server to test against
> when I set it up.
i tried mqas.net again s2s but froze again completing on
On 2014-08-06 10:14, Dave Cridland wrote:
> Without an RSA cert at all, can a remote server with only RSA negotiate TLS?
Sure they can. But here the only non-ECDSA-ciphers offered are DHE
ones, so for another server to support incoming connections from
mqas.net they need to have DH parameters set
On 26 jul. 2014, at 05:18, shm...@riseup.net wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> i was testing an xmpp server and i believe its wrong to reduce the
> score because of the cert which is reported < 1024 bits
>
> i think the testing backend only assumes an RSA cert, is that right ?
>
> the server i tested is usi
Without an RSA cert at all, can a remote server with only RSA negotiate TLS?
On 5 August 2014 19:30, shm...@riseup.net wrote:
> ?
>
> shm...@riseup.net wrote:
> >
> > hi,
> >
> > i was testing an xmpp server and i believe its wrong to reduce the
> > score because of the cert which is reported <
?
shm...@riseup.net wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> i was testing an xmpp server and i believe its wrong to reduce the
> score because of the cert which is reported < 1024 bits
>
> i think the testing backend only assumes an RSA cert, is that right ?
>
> the server i tested is using a cert in a pure ECC ch
hi,
i was testing an xmpp server and i believe its wrong to reduce the
score because of the cert which is reported < 1024 bits
i think the testing backend only assumes an RSA cert, is that right ?
the server i tested is using a cert in a pure ECC chain with ECDSA 384
and not a standard RSA cert
10 matches
Mail list logo
