Re: [Operators] Public XMPP service: jabberzac.org

On 11 March 2015 at 09:43, Mathias Ertl wrote: > back. The XSF has been very sporadic in operators support, the list was > never (at least: not since 2007 or so) really maintained. Sadly, they > were very reluctant to ever ask for support, and *always* simply ignored > any offer for support, even

Re: [Operators] Public XMPP service: jabberzac.org

Mati, your list is excellent and I re-added my server last night (I hadn't realised it'd dropped off at some point, I had an account, just no servers). I really wish it could be the one that's linked to from the "official" sites. Please keep up your great work, it's really appreciated. On 11 Marc

Re: [Operators] Public XMPP service: jabberzac.org

Hi, TL;DR: Add your Jabber-Server to https://list.jabber.at. On 03/11/2015 12:09 AM, ad...@fysh.in wrote: > I’ve listed my server using https://list.jabber.at/ rather than > https://xmpp.net as xmpp.net was no longer being > updated when I applied to get mine added. > > The pro

Re: [Operators] Public XMPP service: jabberzac.org

In there now. I found mention of operat...@conference.jabber.org earlier, but that seems pretty dead. Last comment in there is from August 2014 and it's just someone asking if anyone is there. On 11 March 2015 at 18:13, Yonnji wrote: > I had checked xmpp.org and found a chat room operat...@muc.x

Re: [Operators] Public XMPP service: jabberzac.org

I had checked xmpp.org and found a chat room operat...@muc.xmpp.org On 11/03/15 02:15, Mike Barnes wrote: > Well it'd be ideal to have a conference server on xmpp.net > or xmpp.org , but that really depends > on the domain owners. Doesn't even need to support cli

Re: [Operators] Public XMPP service: jabberzac.org

Well it'd be ideal to have a conference server on xmpp.net or xmpp.org, but that really depends on the domain owners. Doesn't even need to support client users, just the conference would be nice. On 11 March 2015 at 09:54, Yonnji wrote: > MUC is great idea. But on which server? Everyone has thei

Re: [Operators] Public XMPP service: jabberzac.org

I agree on the MUC front. Would be good to collaborate in real time rather than a rather out dated (in my opinion) mailing list. Although I can see the archiving benefits of the mailing list. I’ve listed my server using https://list.jabber.at/ rather than https://xmpp.

Re: [Operators] Public XMPP service: jabberzac.org

MUC is great idea. But on which server? Everyone has their own xD On 11/03/15 01:02, Mike Barnes wrote: > Yeah it looks that way, despite the last time this was brought up on > this list there were reassurances from the maintainer that he was just > "busy" or something. > > This is a massive issu

Re: [Operators] Public XMPP service: jabberzac.org

Yeah it looks that way, despite the last time this was brought up on this list there were reassurances from the maintainer that he was just "busy" or something. This is a massive issue across so many sites. The public directory on xmpp.net needs to be REMOVED if it's not maintained, or its mainten

Re: [Operators] Public XMPP service: jabberzac.org

The list is not managed anymore. No new entries are being added. Rémi Bruggeman On 10 Mar 2015 11:55, Mike Barnes wrote:Hey, I thought I'd submitted this a long time ago, but apparently that only happened in my imagination. Are they getting added at the moment? :DPlease add my public XMPP service

[Operators] Public XMPP service: jabberzac.org

Hey, I thought I'd submitted this a long time ago, but apparently that only happened in my imagination. Are they getting added at the moment? :D Please add my public XMPP service to the list at xmpp.net. The information is as follows: domain: jabberzac.org website: http://jabberzac.org year laun