Hi,
On Sonntag, 7. November 2021 03:51:08 CET Shadow Chat wrote:
> Sorry for bothering you. I’m really confused then. Why does xmpp.org and the
> GitHub specifically say to email this group? Melinda I didn’t mean to upset
> you with my question I was just following the directions.
>
> So no one i
What are you talking about
On Sat, Nov 6, 2021, 1:47 AM Shadow Chat
wrote:
> Hi. Does anyone look at the pull requests on the github page? is that
> maintained anymore? I would be happy to help...
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
Hi!
Today (while I was on the back home) there were about 400 accounts created on
jabber.windfluechter.net from IP 195.154.58.188.
As soon as I was home I discovered this and immediatedly blocked that IP
address.
All created accounts have in common that they shared the following contacts in
Dave;
thanks loads for your feedback. :)
What are the drawbacks you've found? I'd like to address these if
possible. I'd be especially interested to know if you're still seeing
issues on the latest version (4.1.6), and if you've looked at the 4.2
Beta which was released last Friday.
One of
On 20 November 2017 at 08:26, Kristian Rink wrote:
> Folks;
>
> we're currently running an internal XMPP service based upon openfire wich
> works well but has a few drawbacks that don't seem to be addressable with
> this implementation.
>
What are the drawbacks you've found? I'd like to address t
Folks;
we're currently running an internal XMPP service based upon openfire
wich works well but has a few drawbacks that don't seem to be
addressable with this implementation.
Wish list, in our environment:
- Users do use 1:1 messaging as well as some conference channels
(restricted / open
Hi,
Am Sat, 06 May 2017 03:55:45 +0300
schrieb sergio :
> May be both are not alive, but matrix is only two years old and it has no
> problems with message lost, can call and send push messages, and xmpp is
> about 10 times older.b
The Lindy effect [1] would consider the age of xmpp to be a cle
+1. Also, bet on the one that can adapt stably. Matrix has already suffered
interop breaks and forklift upgrades, XMPP is much better in that regard.
One could even see it as the upside of the fragmentation that Matrix
complains of.
On 6 May 2017 08:54, "David Banes" wrote:
> My annual chip in :
My annual chip in :)
XMPP crossed the chasm and peaked (Google Chat, Facebook Chat, WhatsApp) and
some may argue it’s on the tail now, but it does still have a small niche in
the market with lots to offer.
Matrix hasn’t even reached the chasm let alone crossed it so it may have a
future but li
Now I understand, you do not know what you're talking about.
El 06/05/2017 a las 2:55, sergio escribió:
On May 5, 2017 1:25:11 AM GMT+03:00, Evgeny Khramtsov
wrote:
Both are dead in fact, but XMPP at least has a nice past.
May be both are not alive, but matrix is only two years old and it
Sat, 06 May 2017 03:55:45 +0300
sergio wrote:
> May be both are not alive, but matrix is only two years old and it
> has no problems with message lost, can call and send push messages,
> and xmpp is about 10 times older.b
Speaking about protocols both can send pushes and don't lose messages.
Spe
On May 5, 2017 1:25:11 AM GMT+03:00, Evgeny Khramtsov
wrote:
>Both are dead in fact, but XMPP at least has a nice past.
May be both are not alive, but matrix is only two years old and it has no
problems with message lost, can call and send push messages, and xmpp is about
10 times older.b
--
Fri, 05 May 2017 00:44:34 +0300
sergio wrote:
> Matrix lives.
Only in dreams of Matrix developers. Both are dead in fact, but XMPP at
least has a nice past.
Goodbye and thanks for visiting. Have fun in the Matrix world.
On 04.05.2017 23:44, sergio wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'd just like to say goodbuy to Jabber world.
>
> Nowadays XMPP is dead and Matrix lives.
>
> Thank you!
>
Hello.
I'd just like to say goodbuy to Jabber world.
Nowadays XMPP is dead and Matrix lives.
Thank you!
--
sergio.
Same for me.
Various registrations, probably testing if there is a blocking mechanism
on my server.
cycvakipu
prestige-dd
22vortex00
anthonyk
79mak
abdeynet
ejineege30
daviegril46
divinesoul11
confessor
confessor then started spamming:
Automatic XMPP-spammer /
XMPP
its a Tor exit node, i had the same IP doing the same thing a few nights
ago. (Sept. 30)
I blocked it as a temporary measure, but thinking it may be a bad node now.
accounts were:
jfihvubuhty
sane4ek-18
duaneperson
melgrerrson
79
and were all purged.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Georg Lukas
* Nikolay Mitev [2016-10-05 10:23]:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 12:35:04PM -0700, Tony wrote:
> > In addition to 31.184.194.36 please also watch out for
Small status update: in the last weeks I had repeated bursts of
registrations from that IP. It looks like the ISP doesn't react or care
(they crea
Hi
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 12:35:04PM -0700, Tony wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> In addition to 31.184.194.36 please also watch out for
> 78.36.201.252. A
Just got a registration from 78.36.201.252 for user
mfextez...@hmel.org
what's the best way to handle the situation? Ban the ip, delete user?
cheer
Add "mod_admin_extra: {}" to the list of "modules:" in your
ejabberd.yml.
That did the job. May I ask you where did you read about this feature?
(Link or whatever).
Holger
Rafał
It's possible to give me the cronjob, you have scheduled every day?
2016-09-03 21:35 GMT+02:00 Tony :
> Hi folks,
>
> In addition to 31.184.194.36 please also watch out for 78.36.201.252. A
> 'whois' shows very similar info to the IP Georg pointed out. I started
> noticing a suspicious registrati
Hi folks,
In addition to 31.184.194.36 please also watch out for 78.36.201.252. A
'whois' shows very similar info to the IP Georg pointed out. I started
noticing a suspicious registration pattern coming from 78.36.201.252
dated 2016-08-29. The accounts would get registered, but most would not
imme
Hi, I know this is getting boring...
yax.im has been DDoSed every day since the first report, with 6h-12h of
traffic every day. The traffic patterns and JID structures are all the
same, but I have some more insights to contribute.
Some of the zombies were registered on my server as well, with the
* Rafal Zawadzki [2016-09-01 10:22]:
> On 2016-09-01 03:17, A wrote:
> > When I said "by root" I meant that the command is supposed to be
> > executed by superuser. In Ubuntu you typically use sudo for this.
> >
> > You may try:
> >
> > sudo /opt/ejabberd-16.08/bin/ejabberdctl
> >
> > to list a
Then you should investigate how to get it there, maybe some essential
package is missing. I've got ejabberd from Debian testing repository and
my ejabberdctl has get_last command.
On 09/01/2016 10:22 AM, Rafał Zawadzki wrote:
On 2016-09-01 03:17, A wrote:
When I said "by root" I meant that th
On 2016-09-01 03:17, A wrote:
When I said "by root" I meant that the command is supposed to be
executed by superuser. In Ubuntu you typically use sudo for this.
You may try:
sudo /opt/ejabberd-16.08/bin/ejabberdctl
to list all available commands and check if get_last is there.
I have checked
When I said "by root" I meant that the command is supposed to be
executed by superuser. In Ubuntu you typically use sudo for this.
You may try:
sudo /opt/ejabberd-16.08/bin/ejabberdctl
to list all available commands and check if get_last is there.
On 09/01/2016 01:59 AM, Rafal Zawadzki wrote
Forgot to say, this should be run as root, and I assumed ejabberdctl is
installed. How did you install ejabberd? From a repository? What system
you use, by the way?
On 09/01/2016 01:22 AM, Rafal Zawadzki wrote:
This throws unknown command error.
However, I have in my ejabberd.yml following:
Hi,I'm very interested in taking the oracle course.I'm in Cameroon in
Africa and can't find an institution offering it.I need help to study this
course .any hints?
Regards
On Tuesday, August 30, 2016, Marcelo Terres wrote:
> If I'm not wrong, XFS is already discussing about message spam and
> p
Hey. Something like this'd work:
#! /bin/bash
IFS='
'
for USER in `ejabberdctl registered_users creep.im`
do
echo $USER": " | tr -d '\n' && ejabberdctl get_last $USER creep.im
done
Of course you'd like to change "creep.im" to something viable. Here is a
pastebin link: http://pastebin.co
Hi all!
I noticed a lot of registrations for lase time (10-15 in a day). Captcha
is enabled on my servers (and web registration too). But it's a
difficult to find spam accounts because they look like as a real people.
I noticed, that a almost of "strange" accounts came from TOR and US IP
add
Rafal Zawadzki [mailto:blus...@bluszcz.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 5:05 PM
To: Marcin Gondek
Cc: XMPP Operators Group
Subject: Re: [Operators] XMPP DDoS on yax.im today
I am also getting spam about russian silk road. Maybe some spamassasing /
bogofilter alike solution?
I was considerin
What is the easiest way to find when all accounts have been logged last
time?
I am using ejabberd and mod_last is activated.
On 2016-08-30 19:28, Arsimael Inshan wrote:
Yes. Created accounts which nevet logged in. I delete them every 24h
-- Originalnachricht--
VON: Rafał Zawadzki
O
: Operators [mailto:operators-boun...@xmpp.org] On Behalf Of Georg Lukas
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 2:50 PM
To: operators@xmpp.org
Subject: Re: [Operators] XMPP DDoS on yax.im today
Hello again,
first, thanks to everybody who contacted me off-list to resolve spam issues.
A new DDoS is going on
On 2016-08-30 16:06, Peter Schwindt wrote:
Moin,
On 08/30/2016 02:50 PM, Georg Lukas wrote:
[...]
A new DDoS is going on for two hours now, now from 155 different
domains
(most of which are on yesterday's list).
Hi all,
1) I have disabled registration on jabberpl.org.
2) Is there known pat
Moin,
On 08/30/2016 02:50 PM, Georg Lukas wrote:
[...]
> A new DDoS is going on for two hours now, now from 155 different domains
> (most of which are on yesterday's list).
Let me guess: None of these servers have captchas enabled for account
registration?
[...]
> 2. the accounts do not log i
Hello again,
first, thanks to everybody who contacted me off-list to resolve spam
issues.
A new DDoS is going on for two hours now, now from 155 different domains
(most of which are on yesterday's list). First I wondered if I should
publicize additional findings here, but apparently the spammers
If I'm not wrong, XFS is already discussing about message spam and
possible measures to avoid it.
Regards,
Em 30 de ago de 2016 6:18 AM, escreveu:
I read through the list and saw many many domains I also received mass
ammounts of SPAM lately.
Sadly the admins of the domains:
- freexmpp.net
-
I read through the list and saw many many domains I also received mass
ammounts of SPAM lately.
Sadly the admins of the domains:
- freexmpp.net
- instalock.pl
- jabber.ozerki.net
- qip.ru
- sj.ms
Are not responding to any email and don't care about their services.
Last time I had to write to t
I noticed some of those accounts being registered on one of my servers and
regret not looking into it at the time.
All 22 of the accounts on freestucks.com were registered on the same day,
from the same IP (Russian). It stood out because freestucks.com isn't
publicised anywhere, it's on no lists t
Hey folks,
just wanted to let you know that today there was an almost 6h long
XMPP-level DDoS against a single user account on yax.im. The JID was
targeted by a flood of messages with random body content from thousands
of users on over a hundred different servers.
The source of the traffic (I've
* Georg Lukas [2016-08-29 18:35]:
> I've attached the list of domains [...]
Now for real.
Georg
--
|| http://op-co.de ++ GCS d--(++) s: a C+++ UL+++ !P L+++ !E W+++ N ++
|| gpg: 0x962FD2DE || o? K- w---() O M V? PS+ PE-- Y++ PGP+ t+ 5 R+ ||
|| Ge0rG: euIRCnet || X(+++) tv+ b+(++) DI+++ D-
hi this is my service http://chatme.im/servizi/tor-onions-service/
2015-10-16 15:07 GMT+02:00 Dave Cridland :
>
>
> On 15 October 2015 at 21:07, Finn Herzfeld wrote:
>
>> That's pretty cool, but this whole mapping thing seems broken. Would
>> there be a way for a server to probe another server o
On 15 October 2015 at 21:07, Finn Herzfeld wrote:
> That's pretty cool, but this whole mapping thing seems broken. Would
> there be a way for a server to probe another server over the clearnet
> for an onion address, then it can cache that and build it's own list? I
> don't know a ton about the a
On 15.10.2015 at 22:07, Finn Herzfeld wrote:
> That's pretty cool, but this whole mapping thing seems broken. Would
> there be a way for a server to probe another server over the clearnet
> for an onion address, then it can cache that and build it's own list? I
> don't know a ton about the actual
That's pretty cool, but this whole mapping thing seems broken. Would
there be a way for a server to probe another server over the clearnet
for an onion address, then it can cache that and build it's own list? I
don't know a ton about the actual XMPP wire protocol so I'm not sure how
best to go abou
The prosody XMPP server has a mod_onions module that can do federation
between Tor .onion hidden services, to mitigate metadata analysis and
add an additional layer of security.
If any of you Prosody server operators want to set it up, see the
following URL for details:
https://blog.thijsalkema.d
Howdy Dan, here's some info on cPanel:
From: Donald Holl
Sent: April 30, 2015 10:11:30 AM EDT
To: "Dr. David J. Holl Jr."
Subject: Re: [Operators] XMPP in popular hosting control panels?
To clarify further; I believe there is also no native support for TURN;
howev
Hi all,
Can anybody comment on the availability of XMPP and TURN support in the
major hosting control panels?
Many of the major hosting companies offer cPanel or Plesk to their
customers.
Do either of these control panels have native support for any XMPP or
TURN server yet?
Are there plugins
hi, you can use chatme.im service and if you want i can enable a custom
domain for you
2015-03-04 11:49 GMT+01:00 Guus der Kinderen :
> Hello,
>
> Are you searching for a service or a product?
>
> A listing of XMPP domains where you can feely create an account is
> available here: https://xmpp.ne
Hello,
Are you searching for a service or a product?
A listing of XMPP domains where you can feely create an account is
available here: https://xmpp.net/directory.php
A listing of XMPP server software that you can download and install is
available here: http://xmpp.org/xmpp-software/servers/
Ho
Hi ,We need an XMPP server please let us know subscription details,
Hi all,
I've just finished a first pass at adding XMPP support to nginx to allow
it to terminate TLS and auth. I've written a long blog post about why on
earth I would do such a thing:
https://github.com/robn/nginx-xmpp http://robn.io/nginx-xmpp/[1]
Its certainly not for everyone, but if you al
On 01.09.2014 13:37, Dave Cridland wrote:
> I'm already discussing the .im DNSSEC issue, so .ru seems also sensible to
> mention.
>
> Anyone know if .de supports DNSSEC? That's another popular domain for XMPP
> services.
FWIW, I have it deployed, but for non-XMPP purposes.
regards,
jwi
* Stefan Strigler [2014-09-01 13:47]:
> Seems so: http://www.denic.de/domains/dnssec.html
There's also an English translation, FWIW:
http://www.denic.de/en/domains/dnssec.html
Holger
Hey.
Am 01.09.2014 13:37, schrieb Dave Cridland:
Anyone know if .de supports DNSSEC? That's another popular domain for
XMPP
services.
It does since 2011.
felix
Seems so: http://www.denic.de/domains/dnssec.html
It says, it's available since May 2011.
2014-09-01 13:37 GMT+02:00 Dave Cridland :
>
>
>
> On 1 September 2014 12:19, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
>
>> Mon, 1 Sep 2014 11:52:22 +0100
>> Dave Cridland wrote:
>>
>> > On 31 August 2014 22:28, Evgeny K
On 1 September 2014 12:19, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
> Mon, 1 Sep 2014 11:52:22 +0100
> Dave Cridland wrote:
>
> > On 31 August 2014 22:28, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
> >
> > > Sun, 31 Aug 2014 22:35:07 +0200
> > > Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > I left the c2s-encryption-required switch
Mon, 1 Sep 2014 11:52:22 +0100
Dave Cridland wrote:
> On 31 August 2014 22:28, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
>
> > Sun, 31 Aug 2014 22:35:07 +0200
> > Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I left the c2s-encryption-required switch in place (there would
> > > have been out-of-band measures to reach me
On 31 August 2014 22:28, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
> Sun, 31 Aug 2014 22:35:07 +0200
> Jonas Wielicki wrote:
>
>
> > I left the c2s-encryption-required switch in place (there would have been
> > out-of-band measures to reach me if that had been a problem)
>
> A year ago I did some experiment on a
Sun, 31 Aug 2014 22:35:07 +0200
Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> I left the c2s-encryption-required switch in place (there would have been
> out-of-band measures to reach me if that had been a problem)
A year ago I did some experiment on a medium size server (150,000 users
online in peak). I modified ej
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 29.08.2014 10:54, Dave Cridland wrote:
> I've been asked to give a talk next Wednesday to the Internet
> Architecture Board - the senior panel of the IETF - about the
> changes we made to encryption on the XMPP network.
>
[snip]
>
> I'm interest
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On 29 August 2014 11:45, Marco Cirillo wrote:
>
>> The main challenge, at least here, regards communicating with "silos"
>> like Google/Google Apps domains and webex hosted domains (cisco.com
>> etc). And since my users demanded that with
On 29 August 2014 11:45, Marco Cirillo wrote:
> The main challenge, at least here, regards communicating with "silos"
> like Google/Google Apps domains and webex hosted domains (cisco.com etc).
> And since my users demanded that with high voice irregardless of security I
> had in the end to (add
The main challenge, at least here, regards communicating with "silos"
like Google/Google Apps domains and webex hosted domains (cisco.com
etc). And since my users demanded that with high voice irregardless of
security I had in the end to (add code to) allow exceptions to grant s2s
communication
Folks,
I really need your help.
I've been asked to give a talk next Wednesday to the Internet Architecture
Board - the senior panel of the IETF - about the changes we made to
encryption on the XMPP network.
When I say "I've been asked", I quite clearly mean "They asked lots of more
sensible peop
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 09:22:22PM +0200, Christian wrote:
> with all the additions lately (or at least the requests)... IS anyone
> ACTUALLY updating the site?
I see you did already, but for the record (and so that others know): There
are other sites that list XMPP servers, we maintain one (
whats the site i will help i need something to do
Original Message
Subject: [Operators] XMPP List
From: Christian <em...@christian-reiss.de>
Date: Thu, August 28, 2014 12:22 pm
To: XMPP Operators Group <operators@xmpp.org>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Has
I deleted a bunch of servers that scored "F" (since it didn't look very
good to include them in a list of recommended servers), but haven't
added any new ones lately. Perhaps that'll be a good thing for me to do
over the Labor Day weekend...
On 8/28/14, 1:22 PM, Christian wrote:
-BEGIN PG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey,
with all the additions lately (or at least the requests)... IS anyone
ACTUALLY updating the site?
- -Chris.
- --
Christian Reiss - em...@christian-reiss.de /"\ ASCII Ribbon
\ /Camp
On 5/19/14, 8:05 AM, Andreas Tauscher wrote:
This is a known problem.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xmpp-dna-05#section-8 explains
that in more detail.
The currently proposed solutions for this are to either use DANE or POSH.
Thanks. This is an answer.
This exact the headache I have
This is a known problem.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xmpp-dna-05#section-8 explains
that in more detail.
The currently proposed solutions for this are to either use DANE or
POSH.
Thanks. This is an answer.
This exact the headache I have at the moment.
The clients simply want email
On 2014-05-19 10:59, David Banes wrote:
> I'm being really lazy here because I'm time poor, but do we have
> anything like SPF in the XMPP specs?
That's pretty much what Dialback is, except a bit more involved. :)
--
Kim "Zash" Alvefur
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi!
On 2014-05-19T10:35:39 CEST, Andreas Tauscher wrote:
> As I read this if I have a domain foo.bar an the SRV record points to
> im.example.com c2s and s2s has to verify the certificate against
> foo.bar instead im.example.com.
If the name you are claiming is 'foo.bar', why would I check that y
On 19.05.2014 10:59, David Banes wrote:
>
> On 19 May 2014, at 09:55, Kevin Smith wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Andreas Tauscher wrote:
>>> As I read this if I have a domain foo.bar an the SRV record points to
>>> im.example.com c2s and s2s has to verify the certificate against f
On 19 May 2014, at 09:55, Kevin Smith wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Andreas Tauscher wrote:
>> As I read this if I have a domain foo.bar an the SRV record points to
>> im.example.com c2s and s2s has to verify the certificate against foo.bar
>> instead im.example.com.
>
> Right. You
Am 19.05.2014 10:35, schrieb Andreas Tauscher:
Hello!
Maybe somebody can enlighten me.
RFC 3920 says in section 5.1.8:
3920 is obsolete. Refer to 6120 and 6125.
[ SNIP ]
As I read this if I have a domain foo.bar an the SRV record points to
im.example.com c2s and s2s has to verify t
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Andreas Tauscher wrote:
> As I read this if I have a domain foo.bar an the SRV record points to
> im.example.com c2s and s2s has to verify the certificate against foo.bar
> instead im.example.com.
Right. You have (broadly) two possible cases:
1) You trust that DN
Hello!
Maybe somebody can enlighten me.
RFC 3920 says in section 5.1.8:
[ SNIP ]
Certificates MUST be checked against the hostname as provided by
the initiating entity (e.g., a user), not the hostname as
resolved via the Domain Name System; e.g., if the user specifies
a hostname of "exam
Am 03.02.2014 20:52, schrieb Alexander Holler:
Am 03.02.2014 19:56, schrieb Daniel Pocock:
The Debian stuff is still in the works, had a great discussion with
Matthew and some other free software projects at FOSDEM.
Do you've created a task force which comes to action whenever someone
has the
Am 03.02.2014 19:56, schrieb Daniel Pocock:
> The Debian stuff is still in the works, had a great discussion with
> Matthew and some other free software projects at FOSDEM.
Do you've created a task force which comes to action whenever someone
has the impertinence to publicly critize (some issues
On 03/02/14 19:09, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On 3 Feb 2014 16:44, "Andreas Kuckartz" wrote:
>>
>> Claudiu Curcă:
>>> 1. Why is that comment classified as "XMPP bashing"?
>>
>> As far as I know Daniel is mostly an SIP guy and is trying to _help_ the
>> XMPP community by pointing to that comment. But
On 3 Feb 2014 16:44, "Andreas Kuckartz" wrote:
>
> Claudiu Curcă:
> > 1. Why is that comment classified as "XMPP bashing"?
>
> As far as I know Daniel is mostly an SIP guy and is trying to _help_ the
> XMPP community by pointing to that comment. But I also do not think that
> the comment is "bashi
Claudiu Curcă:
> 1. Why is that comment classified as "XMPP bashing"?
As far as I know Daniel is mostly an SIP guy and is trying to _help_ the
XMPP community by pointing to that comment. But I also do not think that
the comment is "bashing" anything.
> why is the comment interesting to the operat
: XMPP Operators Group
Subject: [Operators] XMPP bashing
Maybe somebody would like to reply to this:
http://danielpocock.com/comment/11366#comment-11366
Maybe somebody would like to reply to this:
http://danielpocock.com/comment/11366#comment-11366
On 23/01/14 12:42, Marco Cirillo wrote:
> Il 23/01/2014 12:35, Thomas Camaran ha scritto:
>> but is possibile to set record SRV with service XMPP in other server
>> or network and activate hosting service, simple like e-mail service.
>
> That's not the same thing as Dave pointed out,
> You're basic
Il 23/01/2014 12:35, Thomas Camaran ha scritto:
but is possibile to set record SRV with service XMPP in other server
or network and activate hosting service, simple like e-mail service.
That's not the same thing as Dave pointed out,
You're basically hosting the full service (as normally one wou
but is possibile to set record SRV with service XMPP in other server or
network and activate hosting service, simple like e-mail service.
2014/1/23 Marco Cirillo
> Il 23/01/2014 11:27, Daniel Pocock ha scritto:
>
>
> I'm just wondering about practical forwarding and/or redirection options
> fo
Il 23/01/2014 11:27, Daniel Pocock ha scritto:
I'm just wondering about practical forwarding and/or redirection options
for people who want to offer some kind of XMPP service on their domain
but don't really want to run a full service themselves.
For example, many free software projects (Debian
If you need a XMPP hosting i can configure my server for your domain :-)
2014/1/23 Cesar Alcalde
> Well, actually you could setup DNS SRV records pointing to a third party
> server (like the MX record for mail).
>
> So you can have a server example.org with a web server, a ftp server...
> And x
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Cesar Alcalde wrote:
> Well, actually you could setup DNS SRV records pointing to a third party
> server (like the MX record for mail).
>
> So you can have a server example.org with a web server, a ftp server...
> And xmpp accounts @example.org although the actua
Well, actually you could setup DNS SRV records pointing to a third party
server (like the MX record for mail).
So you can have a server example.org with a web server, a ftp server... And
xmpp accounts @example.org although the actual xmpp service is provided by
provider.net.
Also, there are serve
This is possibly a better conversation to have on jdev@ or standards@
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> For example, many free software projects (Debian, Fedora) offer their
> developers mail forwarding (poc...@debian.org->dan...@pocock.com.au)
> without having any mailbox
Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:27:19 +0100
Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> I'm just wondering about practical forwarding and/or redirection
> options for people who want to offer some kind of XMPP service on
> their domain but don't really want to run a full service themselves.
>
> For example, many free soft
I'm just wondering about practical forwarding and/or redirection options
for people who want to offer some kind of XMPP service on their domain
but don't really want to run a full service themselves.
For example, many free software projects (Debian, Fedora) offer their
developers mail forwarding
Yes, the webserver is running, I meant the XMPP Server. Every time I try
to connect to it via Pidgin, it gives me a "Server not found".
*Greetings*
you see here http://jappix.org/about
2012/8/31 Arsimael Inshan :
> Is the Server "muc.jappix.org" available? I can't reach the server and every
> "contact info" points to this server.
>
> Greetings
> Arsimael
Is the Server "muc.jappix.org" available? I can't reach the server and
every "contact info" points to this server.
Greetings
Arsimael
hi,
i openend for you https://github.com/jappix/jappix/issues/142
2012/8/31 Arsimael Inshan :
> Hi,
>
> normally I join the xmpp chat and ask them thats the problem this time, but
> the chatserver under jappix.org is down (and it seems that it is down since
> a long time) I'm using prosody as ser
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
