On 01.09.2014 13:37, Dave Cridland wrote:
> I'm already discussing the .im DNSSEC issue, so .ru seems also sensible to
> mention.
>
> Anyone know if .de supports DNSSEC? That's another popular domain for XMPP
> services.
FWIW, I have it deployed, but for non-XMPP purposes.
regards,
jwi
* Stefan Strigler [2014-09-01 13:47]:
> Seems so: http://www.denic.de/domains/dnssec.html
There's also an English translation, FWIW:
http://www.denic.de/en/domains/dnssec.html
Holger
Hey.
Am 01.09.2014 13:37, schrieb Dave Cridland:
Anyone know if .de supports DNSSEC? That's another popular domain for
XMPP
services.
It does since 2011.
felix
Seems so: http://www.denic.de/domains/dnssec.html
It says, it's available since May 2011.
2014-09-01 13:37 GMT+02:00 Dave Cridland :
>
>
>
> On 1 September 2014 12:19, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
>
>> Mon, 1 Sep 2014 11:52:22 +0100
>> Dave Cridland wrote:
>>
>> > On 31 August 2014 22:28, Evgeny K
On 1 September 2014 12:19, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
> Mon, 1 Sep 2014 11:52:22 +0100
> Dave Cridland wrote:
>
> > On 31 August 2014 22:28, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
> >
> > > Sun, 31 Aug 2014 22:35:07 +0200
> > > Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > I left the c2s-encryption-required switch
Mon, 1 Sep 2014 11:52:22 +0100
Dave Cridland wrote:
> On 31 August 2014 22:28, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
>
> > Sun, 31 Aug 2014 22:35:07 +0200
> > Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I left the c2s-encryption-required switch in place (there would
> > > have been out-of-band measures to reach me
On 31 August 2014 22:28, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
> Sun, 31 Aug 2014 22:35:07 +0200
> Jonas Wielicki wrote:
>
>
> > I left the c2s-encryption-required switch in place (there would have been
> > out-of-band measures to reach me if that had been a problem)
>
> A year ago I did some experiment on a
Sun, 31 Aug 2014 22:35:07 +0200
Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> I left the c2s-encryption-required switch in place (there would have been
> out-of-band measures to reach me if that had been a problem)
A year ago I did some experiment on a medium size server (150,000 users
online in peak). I modified ej
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 29.08.2014 10:54, Dave Cridland wrote:
> I've been asked to give a talk next Wednesday to the Internet
> Architecture Board - the senior panel of the IETF - about the
> changes we made to encryption on the XMPP network.
>
[snip]
>
> I'm interest
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On 29 August 2014 11:45, Marco Cirillo wrote:
>
>> The main challenge, at least here, regards communicating with "silos"
>> like Google/Google Apps domains and webex hosted domains (cisco.com
>> etc). And since my users demanded that with
On 29 August 2014 11:45, Marco Cirillo wrote:
> The main challenge, at least here, regards communicating with "silos"
> like Google/Google Apps domains and webex hosted domains (cisco.com etc).
> And since my users demanded that with high voice irregardless of security I
> had in the end to (add
The main challenge, at least here, regards communicating with "silos"
like Google/Google Apps domains and webex hosted domains (cisco.com
etc). And since my users demanded that with high voice irregardless of
security I had in the end to (add code to) allow exceptions to grant s2s
communication
Folks,
I really need your help.
I've been asked to give a talk next Wednesday to the Internet Architecture
Board - the senior panel of the IETF - about the changes we made to
encryption on the XMPP network.
When I say "I've been asked", I quite clearly mean "They asked lots of more
sensible peop
13 matches
Mail list logo
