On 12 Jan 2016, at 17:55, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
> Over the years we have discussed a number of potential methods for mitigating
> (I do not say solving) the spam problem. For example:
>
> http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0159.html
> http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0268.html
> http://xmpp.org/
On 13 January 2016 at 02:23, Kim Alvefur wrote:
> On 01/12/2016 06:55 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > Over the years we have discussed a number of potential methods for
> > mitigating (I do not say solving) the spam problem. For example:
> >
> > http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0159.html
> > http:
Wed, 13 Jan 2016 03:23:37 +0100
Kim Alvefur wrote:
> On 01/12/2016 06:55 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > Over the years we have discussed a number of potential methods for
> > mitigating (I do not say solving) the spam problem. For example:
> >
> > http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0159.html
> > h
On 01/12/2016 06:55 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Over the years we have discussed a number of potential methods for
> mitigating (I do not say solving) the spam problem. For example:
>
> http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0159.html
> http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0268.html
> http://xmpp.org/extensi
Over the years we have discussed a number of potential methods for
mitigating (I do not say solving) the spam problem. For example:
http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0159.html
http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0268.html
http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0275.html
I suggest that we work on this problem m