Dear OPM friends,
below the announcement of a DUNE spring school for those who might be
interested.
Best,
Robert
-Forwarded by Robert Klöfkorn/IRIS on 01/13/2015 15:31 -
To: robert.kloefk...@iris.no
From: Peter Bastian
Date: 01/13/2015 09:39
Subject: Dune Course Heidelberg Februar
Hello Jørgen,
I think the deal.II example is a good example how to incorporate PETSc bindings
into a finite element code.
I don't think it is a good idea to support an operator [][] for matrices for
the reasons that you mentioned below.
You usually get away with the kind of SetMatrixEntry(i,j,va
On 01/13/2015 11:32 AM, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently playing with implementing (proper) support for petsc in
> OPM. For this we need better containers and interfaces than petsc's own.
>
> The thing is, petsc doesn't support direct memory access. While this is
> good object orien
Hi,
I'm currently playing with implementing (proper) support for petsc in
OPM. For this we need better containers and interfaces than petsc's own.
The thing is, petsc doesn't support direct memory access. While this is
good object oriented practice, it creates some headaches when
implementing ref
