Hi Tobias,
Access to adjoints is interesting for more of us. We have not been able to
prioritise it, but getting adjoint output is quickly moving up the list.
However, I would be most interested in seeing the functionality in our most
capable simulator, which today is flow (found within the opm
Hi,
I'd just like to add that I think it makes a lot of sense to experiment in a
less complex setting first, before adding these
capabilities to Flow. Also, since we are going to refactor the Flow code to
enable easier extension it may be a moving
target for a while. In the long term, I definite
That sounds reasonable, it also seems to me that this might be the best
place to start implementing the adjoints since the linearized residuals are
already implemented.
On 20 April 2015 at 09:05, Alf Birger Rustad wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> Access to adjoints is interesting for more of us. We have
Okay, I am only going to be involved with two-phase flow in my master
thesis so I'll probably stick with that. My experience with using TAO (and
PETSc) for advection-diffusion-reaction equations has been positive.
Tobias
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-proj
