> 28. aug. 2015 kl. 11.46 skrev Roland Kaufmann :
>
> On 28. aug. 2015 at 11.34, Roland Kaufmann wrote:
>>> One question: Are you moving the HEAD version of the files, or the
>>> entire history?
>
> On 28. Aug. 2015 at 11:42, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote:
>> I imagine that we would be moving the HEAD
On 28. aug. 2015 11:42, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote:
28. aug. 2015 kl. 11.34 skrev Roland Kaufmann :
On 28. Aug. 2015 at 11:10, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote:
I propose the following small change to start off: rename opm-cmake
to opm-common. ... It will grow (primarily by moving code there from
other mod
On 28. aug. 2015 at 11.34, Roland Kaufmann wrote:
One question: Are you moving the HEAD version of the files, or the
entire history?
On 28. Aug. 2015 at 11:42, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote:
I imagine that we would be moving the HEAD version, and make a note
of where it came from (in the commit that
> 28. aug. 2015 kl. 11.34 skrev Roland Kaufmann :
>
> On 28. Aug. 2015 at 11:10, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote:
>> I propose the following small change to start off: rename opm-cmake
>> to opm-common. ... It will grow (primarily by moving code there from
>> other modules)
>
> One question: Are you mov
On 28. Aug. 2015 at 11:10, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote:
I propose the following small change to start off: rename opm-cmake
to opm-common. ... It will grow (primarily by moving code there from
other modules)
One question: Are you moving the HEAD version of the files, or the
entire history?
I ha
Dear OPM community,
Many of us feel that our current module/repository structure is a little
confusing and should be improved.
For example, from the name, one would expect that opm-core would be the single
module on which all
others depend, but that is not the case.
We should move forward one s
